![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,656
|
Hi Fernando and Jim,
Many thanks for your continued interest and elucidation. I'm still trying to tie down a more specific date and style for this blade but from your replies and what I've found myself the range of possibilities are pretty wide, the search goes on. Thanks again.My Regards, Norman. P.S. Jim, is the blade you refer to etched or stamped/engraved? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,848
|
It is stamped and seems in accord with Solingen work, the date range seems reliable as Boccia & Coelho seems to be such a work . The attribution of the smallsword in to Florence, but it is more a provenance note . As Wallace Coll (Mann,1962) notes from during the lifetime of Tomas Aiala, his name had become rather a trademark for quality and it seems there were blades c1620 from Milan using it. Therefore this could equally, and even probably, be a Milan issue. It seems these 'eye' marks were not apparent in Solingen blades I can recall.
Jim P.S. Jim, is the blade you refer to etched or stamped/engraved?[/QUOTE] |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,070
|
Hi Norman,
as per your Email request, herewith my opinion; I think it's a rapier blade (given the broad ricasso of same width indeed an early rapier blade and not a small sword blade) from the last quarter of the 16th century perhaps very early 17thC, given the eye mark, probably Italy. Hope it helps. best, jasper |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,656
|
Hi Jim and Jasper,
Many thanks for your thoughts and input, much appreciated. My Regards, Norman. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|