![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 334
|
I agree with Jasper, this saber is totally out of context to the 18th c. and is much earlier. The distinctive pronged pommel and matching bars of the cross guard are good signs of the 16th c. however the presence of a well-developped thumb ring may date the hilt into the (early) 17th c.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 237
|
In my somewhat uneducated opinion, the blade appears to be 19th century to me. I could be wrong though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Quote:
Not that Tony would like the idea, though
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rhineland
Posts: 385
|
What happened to the cross-guard on the 2nd picture of the 1st entry??
I agree with your doubts concerning the blade. As the riveting looks unopened and the condition is fitting to the rest of the sword, I think we should discuss the possibility that this is a piece from the Historism/19th century. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|