Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 1st March 2015, 05:18 PM   #1
erlikhan
Member
 
erlikhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 452
Default British silver army belt and pouch

Hi. I 've come along this belt in Istanbul. All of the pieces are silver hallmarked. I request a definition and a value assistance please (you can send PM for that)..

tanks a lot in advance.
Attached Images
          
erlikhan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2015, 12:57 AM   #2
Fernando K
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 669
Default

hello

I can only help you with quality metal, which is .925 (sterling), the city is Birmingham and lowercase K is the year 1808, the Z lowercase is 1823.

Fernando K
Fernando K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2015, 08:15 PM   #3
Ken Maddock
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ireland
Posts: 104
Default

Hi
No idea of value but just a bit of information
The crown on the box is for queen Victoria, reigned from 1837 ( the gold coloured cypher says VR)

Fernando has identified year as 1823 which would be William iv on the arrow part

And the badge with more rounded top crown looks to have GR with a v in the middle, he was reigning from 1910 to 1936, maybe my mistake in what I see though but it does look like this

Just checked kings own Norfolk yeomanry only formed in 1901 so it is GR V

So it looks as if there is a lot of chopping and changing going on
Looks nice overall but maybe it is a parts made piece, that I do not know
Regards
Ken

Last edited by Ken Maddock; 2nd March 2015 at 08:26 PM.
Ken Maddock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2015, 05:03 AM   #4
Shakethetrees
Member
 
Shakethetrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 363
Default

The hallmark on the vent pick holder is for London, and is 20th century. I will have to get to my library to give you the correct date.
Shakethetrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2015, 08:58 AM   #5
Ken Maddock
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ireland
Posts: 104
Default

Hi shakethetrees
Which component part is the vent picker
The arrow like objects?
Thanks
Ken
.
Ken Maddock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2015, 09:47 AM   #6
Andreas
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Ionian Islands, Greece
Posts: 96
Default

It seems to be the shoulder belt and pouch of an officer of the Norfolk Yeomanry (The King's Own Royal Regiment). Their 1/1st Battalion fought at Gallipoli in 1915, which is probably how the belt found its way to Istanbul. This is consistent with the presence of George V’s cypher. The pouch is older, as the lid bears, as noted by Ken, the royal cypher of Queen Victoria. Maybe a family heirloom, the Norfolk Yeomanry was disbanded during her reign in 1849 and was raised again in 1901 by King Edward VII.
Ken, yes the vent picks (known as “prickers”) are the dart shaped objects.
Regards,
Andreas
Andreas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2015, 09:07 PM   #7
Fernando K
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 669
Default

hello

Two issues. Indeed, for the first hallmark city is London, and then the lowercase letter corresponds to 1825.
The figure is not crowned GR but VR; confusion comes from considering the bottom of the V as a fifth Romano

Ask the punches (pickers) do not correspond to an officer of artillery?

Fernando K
Fernando K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2015, 11:43 AM   #8
thinreadline
Member
 
thinreadline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wirral
Posts: 1,204
Default

The crossbelt has a Kings Crown cypher and refers to George V as has been observed above , and the pouch itself is has a Queen Victoria cypher . The hallmarks cannot therefore be as early as has been stated . The original purpose of the arrow shaped prickers was to jam into the vents of enemy guns in order to 'spike' them ie render them useless for the duration of the battle. They were originally carried by officers of Light Cavalry regiments for this purpose and the later silver versions were a symbolic reference to this once vital function.
thinreadline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2015, 12:34 AM   #9
thinreadline
Member
 
thinreadline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wirral
Posts: 1,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinreadline
The crossbelt has a Kings Crown cypher and refers to George V as has been observed above , and the pouch itself is has a Queen Victoria cypher . The hallmarks cannot therefore be as early as has been stated . The original purpose of the arrow shaped prickers was to jam into the vents of enemy guns in order to 'spike' them ie render them useless for the duration of the battle. They were originally carried by officers of Light Cavalry regiments for this purpose and the later silver versions were a symbolic reference to this once vital function.
The leopard face hallmark indicates London and the k is for 1905 .
thinreadline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2015, 10:12 AM   #10
Ken Maddock
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ireland
Posts: 104
Default

Just a taught
Is having a hallmark on the front of a silver item not a bit unusual
Regards
Ken
Ken Maddock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2015, 05:12 PM   #11
Shakethetrees
Member
 
Shakethetrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Maddock
Just a taught
Is having a hallmark on the front of a silver item not a bit unusual
Regards
Ken
Not at all. The idea of hiding or obscuring these marks is counter to their purpose, which is to show that it is indeed made of sterling silver by a certain maker and was tested by an independent authority in a particular town in a particular year.

When a silversmith or jeweler submits a piece (required by law) for hall marking, if it somehow fails to meet stringent testing (I will have to find the exact standards, if anyone is interested), the piece will be returned to whoever submitted it, smashed beyond recovery.

This system was imposed way back in the 1100's or thereabout to maintain the quality of England's coinage, as coins were melted and fashioned into finished goods which were eventually melted and turned back into coins. Silver solder is a little bit less pure than sterling, so the incorporation of it, bit by bit, into coinage adulterated the end product.

The marking system was seen as a consumer protection issue, the marks, in a sense, creating a "paper trail" tracking each work back to its maker. If a maker somehow obtains spurious marking stamps and turns out substandard goods, he will be prosecuted for fraud. This is something they take seriously, to this day.

So, if the buyer can't clearly see the marks, his confidence in the quality of the work is gone.
Shakethetrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2015, 06:56 PM   #12
Ken Maddock
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ireland
Posts: 104
Default

I hear what you are saying about making the marks visible,
Just thinking about sports medals, cutlery, plates and jugs etc. most in my limited experience have hallmark on the reverse.
just a taught nothing more
regards
Ken
Ken Maddock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2015, 08:02 PM   #13
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Maddock
I hear what you are saying about making the marks visible,
Just thinking about sports medals, cutlery, plates and jugs etc. most in my limited experience have hallmark on the reverse.
just a taught nothing more
regards
Ken
I understand your point, Ken.
In fact the stamping of a hallmark on the front face of an object such as this one may ensure its value but it sure looks bizarre and unaesthetic, somehow disfiguring the piece.
Probably meanwhile other criteria also applies, both in Britain as surely in other countries. In Portugal, for one, fine metal objects are always stamped in discreet places; there are even punches of different sizes for pieces of both little and large dimensions. I also have a little British jug with the hallmarks in the bottom; a Russian sugar tweezer with the marks in the interior of one of the handles, a Dane spoon marked in its arm back and an Egiptian brooch with the tiny mark in the fixing pin.
I take it that, when the consumer buys a gold or a silver object, he has a chance to be shown its hallmark by the seller. Once he is confident that the mark is in it, there is no need to show it off to others by having it stamped in the middle of its face.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.