![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
![]() Quote:
The Wikepedia link is by no means complete and it will mature as the detail comes in. I have planned a pictorial account though at the moment as you must surely appreciate there are conflicting Hilt styles as described ... and for example I can show a monster Hilt form and a Lion Hilt looking form... Right now, for example, I am looking at the two earlier extant variants which look like each being drawn from different Deities (the Japanese Museum and the art work of the Popham Armour)... maybe they were made in a different workshop and by different artists and with a slightly irregular idea in their minds of what Deity to fashion... artistic impression? On the various comments by auction houses I cannot fathom your criticism since I never said they were written in stone...these are simply descriptions..and there are many more examples ...which was the reason for their inclusion..as having added to the conundrum. The inclusion of the Russian source at St Petersburg is easy to comprehend but I will add to that to clarify where a sword thus marked has arrived from... see https://www.pinterest.com/karleighvestal/swords/. By the way, without wishing to jump to the defence of auction houses, these big outfits often have superb research departments and highly specialized people therein. Obviously the Elgood description is placed for accuracy but also to show the generic wording often used in the Kastane Hilt descriptions. In reference to links on Wikepedia I beg to differ Sir, since the finest reference to the developing story is of our own Forum and this thread. I don't think I am beating a dead horse moreover your comment may be misunderstood since we usually give constructive criticism and this is certainly not. The thread is progressing, albeit slowly, and as contributors we have a duty to expose the facts especially in an area so badly illuminated before. Regarding the term Gargoyle please simply type into web search the term Makara Gargoyle then after that is considered type in Lion Gargoyle..Do you not then think that Gargoyle is a reasonable descriptive? I would add the word Grotesque as well. The following are very recently added so how can you say the thread is not progressing? viz; 1.The excellent detail already exhumed plus the added details on "Rankadu Pattala" and the 1807 revelation that the sword was considered as a rank indicator are facts not well laid out before. 2.The detail on the Japanese Museum piece perhaps showing the blade mark now being traced is fascinating. 3.The Extraordinary blade possibly Storta is a delight to see... and ponder over. 4.The new picture of the Sri Lankan VIP wearing the Kastane is amazing. I still have the drive determination and effort to continue even if others have not for now... and in an effort to display encouragement to others ... members and non members alike I continue to shine a light into the dark corners of this subject. Regards, Ibrahiim al Balooshi. Last edited by Ibrahiim al Balooshi; 18th January 2014 at 01:41 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|