![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 96
|
![]()
Fernando, it is not hollow just a hole and most of the weight is in that area. I joined a chinese cite that discusses weapons hopefully the can help me with this item as well.
Last edited by clockwork; 18th June 2013 at 02:29 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 385
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by trenchwarfare; 19th June 2013 at 02:53 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
I'd go back to that hole. It must be there for some reason. Was there some appendix stuck in it ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
|
![]() Quote:
--it's likely not a hay harpoon or similar, because there's no barb on the sharp end. --it's likely not a weaponoid artifact, because there's no good evidence that the sharp end was sharpened to make it look like a weapon. The swinging bit does act as a blade guard for the sharp end, because it won't swing around the heavy end, and the ring to close it only closes the sharp end. --The ends are asymmetric, and there's a hole in the heavy end. This suggests that there's a purpose to the design, and possibly that purpose is not confusing collectors. --The joint for the swivel is fairly thin, which makes it less likely to be a fulcrum for a heavy weight (as in a butcher's gambrel) or a scale. So what have we got? I still don't know. One thing I'm starting to wonder is whether it's part of some sort of booby trap, where the sharp end gets swiveled out by the action of a string on the heavy end. The other thought is that it's the most over-built tent stake I've ever seen (sharp end goes in the ground, heavy end is used as the tie-off, and sheath makes it easier to carry). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|