![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,284
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: 40˚00' N, 83˚00' W
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
Congratulations on a fine blade for a very fine price. Sometimes Ebay gambles do pay off. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,284
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,193
|
Here is an image of a heavily carved scabbard that is in the Neka Museum in Ubud. The material is ivory. The display tag does not give any information on specific purpose nor use.
I would be extremely cautious in accepting any information provided in Edward Frey's book on keris. The photos are good and provided the captions are cross checked, these photos can be quite useful for ID purposes, as they are clear and distinct and cover a range of styles. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: 40˚00' N, 83˚00' W
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,284
|
Quote:
What do you think in terms of age speculation on the blade Alan. So little has been written in English specifically on the Balinese keris and identifying it's various dhapurs through the centuries. Any ideas? I am also curious about the very simple kinatah. I don't get the feeling that this rather plain and unpretentious application was done to try to raise the sale potential of this keris. It's just too simple and wasn't even mentioned in the sellers description.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,193
|
David, I've pretty much stayed out of discussion on this keris, because I really have nothing positive to add.
I don't think the blade is all that old, maybe mid-19th century earliest, it is FAQ for Bali keris of this era, the gold, if indeed it is gold, is not a recognised ornamentaion in this position and style, my immediate thought is that it may have been added to cover a hole in this part of the blade, if not this, then I have no idea what its there for. The dress in my opinion is quite good, and I'd leave it as is. Yeah, sure its not old, but so what? Are we students and collectors of the keris, or antique collectors? Things do not need to be old to be good, and just because something is old, that does not necessarily make it good. Of its type, this dress is pretty nice. The really great thing about this keris is the price. This was a give-away. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,284
|
Quote:
I am questioning about the age of the blade, not because it matters to me that it be 18th C or earlier, but because i find the dhapur, especially in regards to the execution around the gandik, to be different from what we commonly find on late 19th and early 20th C Bali keris. I did not mean to imply that it held any great antiquity and i never imaged it was anything more that a fairly average quality blade. As for the gold, i don't believe it is covering any holes and it was once on the other side of the blade as well in the same spot. Just trace remnants remain there. And i am sure that i am not knocking the sheath. The craft is good for what it is and i do plan to leave it as is. Frey may be off track indeed, but i would still like to trace the origin of this sheath style. I don't have any problem with it being newer and i'm actually finding it a pleasant ensemble.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|