Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 2nd April 2009, 09:31 AM   #9
sirupate
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 373
Default

I agree with what Berkley says, the nail holes would have been for the general housing on the kukri, which the frogs (if they were used on this kukri), would have fitted over the top.
I wonder if this kukri didn't belong to an ex Gurkha hence the ridge for the frog on his scabbard, and the possiblity of frog carry, with the ex Gurha wearing a more western style of dress, which was bought or given to a Westerner in Nepal May 1965, and then found its way to Guernsey, and onto you Richard
sirupate is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.