Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 16th December 2024, 01:09 AM   #11
RobT
Member
 
RobT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 548
Default Missing The Defining Element

Sajen,

As I mentioned in my earlier post, in the US, Bowies can come with or without a clip point (many 19th century British examples have a spear point). Bowies also come with a variety of hilts and cross guard shapes but the three indispensable characteristics of a traditional Bowie in the US are large size, fixed blade, and (above all) a cross guard (with or without D-guard). Legend has it that Bowies have a cross guard because Rezin Bowie cut his hand severely when his hand slid up the blade of a knife he was using to kill a calf. Your example lacks the cross guard. I don’t have a single example of a “Philippine Bowie” in my collection that doesn’t have a cross guard. So, the question remains, is the “Philippine Bowie” as exemplified by so many WWII souvenirs a creation made especially after WWII for sale to US troops or was it an indigenous creation totally separate from US influence?

Sincerely,
RobT
RobT is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.