![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Northern Germany
Posts: 149
|
![]()
I had a conversation with an extraordinary swordsmith from Poland lately.
We discussed sword usage in relation to the damage the blade is taking especially from parrying. We came to the conclusion Mr.Zīs theory of how blows were parried with the type II saber is one which you can expect from an olympic fencer (as Mr.Z was) but will not get you and your blade far in battle. Reflecting parades will lead to serious edge damage to such an extend that the used blade must be fully replaced after fighting multiple opponents. Therefore my personal working theory is now, like old sources from the medival (f.e. my time-distant teacher Peter von Danzig from the 15th century) tell us that one should only parry with the strong ("Stärke") of the blade, near the ricasso or the crossguard itself. While this can seem obvious, one has to keep in mind that fights with sharp weapons are very uncommon these days (I know of certain madmen) and such a theory could be only verified by clashing ORIGINAL blades, not modern replica grade to see how our forefathers steel behaves. As usual: There is no black and white, make your own conclusions using your logical mind but mind the experience of people who know their stuff. Cheers P.S.: I would very much appreciate input in form of images of your Karabelas or thoughts on this thread. Nearly 1300 readers must have something interesting to say. Thanks go out to the people who commented so far. This is for you guys, so if you want to hear more, I need feedback. I know the stuff and donīt need to write it down for myself :P |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
karabela, polish, saber, szabla |
|
|