6th June 2021, 04:19 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Eastern Sierra
Posts: 467
|
Kerala Kard?
The question of the etiquette in reviving a topic that hasn't been spoken of in a bit is always interesting. I have decided the best way is to link the old threads to the new one giving us a common point to embark from.
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ht=kerala+kard These relatively common knives seem to get little attention in literature or our forum. Characterized by a forward curving blade (slightly reminiscent of a kukri), a T-spine stabilizing a thin cross section below, brazed metal bolsters, and riveted scale handles with a parrot head pommel. The form seems to be a blade of the common man. Is the thin cross section of the blade to aid in slicing or for economy to save iron and steel? Was it more of a utility knife or a weapon? To me many examples look to be cut orientated, but the T-spine seems to disagree with this analysis. On the other hand the thin edge of the self guard would be less than comfortable if any resistance was encountered and one's full weight was being applied to the thrust. Maybe the lack of bling has contributed to their obscurity. I have a couple of these blades, more or less in excavated condition, sitting around because I have always been curious about their construction methods. The cambered blade style is a shape I have experimented with off and on over the years as a utility knife. I wondered if any forum members had information about these knives? Are they a relatively new form (19th century)? Does anyone know of source material concerning them? Stone's glossary hasn't yielded much information on this subject. Is the name Kerala kard still current? Since the style is supposedly southern Indian; is kard a Persian word correct or is it an anglicization or derivative of khad, Sanskrit meaning "to cut" (Elgood, Hindu Arms and ritual" P. 258 Piha-Kaetta)? If the blade recurves does it become a pesh kabaz? Thanks, IP Last edited by Interested Party; 6th June 2021 at 11:24 PM. Reason: typo |
|
|