![]()  | 
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#11 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2008 
				Location: Kingdom of the Netherlands 
				
				
					Posts: 64
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thanks Nathaniel, very useful! 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Bowditch on his website, last updated July 28, 2007; "One significant change that has been made is the phasing out of the now-obsolete Greaves-Winston typing system. We have learned a lot since this was first developed, and we are able now to define types more appropriately along ethnic lines. " But he continues "As noted, not all of the pages have been updated with the new typology" I like to get a handle on the old and new typology and would be most interested in the primary sources that helped the typologies. There must be either: 1. Period accounts 2. Period drawings 3. Early photographs 4. Benchmark pieces with markings and/or sound provenance Unfortunately, no list of these seems to have been left. The Kachin type is mentioned in Egerton, 1880. I quite like Bell's little paper which is a welcome oasis in the overall lack of sources. But he too only described local conditions for smiths and not so much the types of swords made.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
		
  | 
	
		
  |