Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 25th April 2017, 06:23 AM   #3
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default

Those are , of course, exaggerated versions of the real belt swords: very conventionally-looking but with thin blades capable of being wrapped around the waist. They have a hole on the tip and a button on the handle.

Tirri's collection had one. Elgood showed 2 examples in his book on South Indian weapons. The picture concentrated on the handle ends of them and did not show the entire blades. That was the reason one person of our mutual acquaintance boldly questioned the veracity of Elgood's description. Well....:-)

As a matter of fact, some Caucasian shashkas had very thin and springy blades and were kept fully bent in round flour sieves. So the idea is not limited to South India. The fighting capability of belt swords is unlikely to compare with traditional swords, but they were intended to be hidden weapons of the last resort.

The multibladed Kalaripayattu versions are in some way similar to Chinese chain whips. I suspect all of them are rather recent developments of martial arts schools.
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.