![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,234
|
![]()
Dear All,
I would much appreciate your thoughts on this one. Actually quality/state of preservation of the blade wasn't acceptable for me, yet the whole was so interesting, that I decided to go for it. The blade is 32,5 cm long, pesi 5,2 cm. If pesi was cut, it happened a long time ago, there are no signs of this procedure left. The blade fits perfectly in the sheath, at the mouth of the sheath as well as in the length. There was a lot of rust between blade and Gonjo, Gonjo has been pushed down about 1 mm down the Pesi. The mounts becouse of the finial (buntut) could be atributed to Kedah (this sultanate interests me more and more; I would like to open a separate thread on Keris from there). Sampir is made from black, very dense wood (Kenaung?). My general question is the provenance of the blade: is this an older javanese blade, or could it perhaps be an old peninsular blade, perhaps a proto-Malela blade? I am really interested in all aspects of "this is so, becouse" regarding it. My thoughts are: the pamor looks Javanese; the blade in current state is to short for a Javanese blade, as is the Pesi; Ricikan look very Javanese, yet the protruding tip at the Gandhik side of Gonjo is perhaps a little bit strange. As I said, I am interested in every aspect regarding this keris. Last edited by Gustav; 5th December 2012 at 03:03 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|