Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 21st February 2007, 07:32 AM   #7
Pukka Bundook
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
Default

I consider all the posts above as valid, and thank each of you for your contribution!
The reason I purchased this one, was because I was unaware of crack in blade, but aware of lost quillon.
I don't have endless resources, and purchasing something in this condition is still to me a treasure.
Once in possesion of something like this, comes the questions of what to do or not do in the way of restoration or preservation.
Ham,
I strongly lean to-wards doing nothing, as this weapon could have gained this defect honestly in combat, and to fix it,( if possible )would detract from its history.
The other side of me likes a challenge, and the thought of retuning this old warrior to its former usefulness is also a strong draw.
Fenris,
I think you summed up the situation extremely well.
That is why I seek your input.........in order to make a more informed decision!

Could anyone answer my other questions, re. age, and wether these wide flat blades were in use in conjunction with the thicker, narrower blades???

Thank you again,
Richard.
Pukka Bundook is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.