New yataghan

ham · 9th December 2005, 03:55 AM

Gentlemen,

Actually, this is Chechen work. Culturally, the Chechens were more closely associated with the Cherkess-- their belief in Nart cosmogony stands as evidence for this. Due largely to geography, they were often politically aligned with Daghestan during the 19th century. As a result, their decorative repetoire could include the entire range of Circassian motifs but also drew on Daghestan styles as well. Sparse engraving and use of niello and gilding were found side by side with extensive engraving, chiselling and large, complex areas of niello.
After the Murid Wars, and increasingly into the early 20th century, Chechen work was also distinguishable by a sometimes random combination of these styles, with no particular one prevailing-- sorry to say, as time went on, the workmanship was rarely equal to either of its cultural ancestors. The motifs on the scabbard and lower grip mount of this kindjal are a simplified "spiral vine" often worked in fine relief by Kubachi smiths. Here, it has been deeply engraved into the silver and heavily embellished in niello. Unfortunately, neither the grip buttons nor the central decoration assist in establishing a place of origin as they are all associated-- the buttons from a belt and the central ornament from a horse trapping. This however indicates the paucity of materials in early 20th century Chechnia, and the desire to maintain traditional motifs. It is typical of Chechen weapons which survived the Revolution and First World War.
The grip of this dagger is also closely derived from a particularly popular Kubachi type usually rendered entirely in silver, ivory, or a combination thereof. Great store was set by heirloom blades, hence the appearance of an early date on the blade of the kindjal under discussion is not incredible though the mounts clearly postdate it.
Caucasian arms, perhaps more than any others save Indonesian, require a great deal of study of individual examples in order to begin to be able to categorize them. The Russian and Turkish museums afford the best selection for the serious student but can be difficult to gain access to. The works of Mrs. Astvatsaturian and Mr. Askhabov are likewise invaluable and now, thanks to the internet, generally available.
Posting an image of the mark on the blade would probably be very helpful.

Sincerely,

Ham

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

9th December 2005, 03:55 AM	#21
ham Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 190	Gentlemen, Actually, this is Chechen work. Culturally, the Chechens were more closely associated with the Cherkess-- their belief in Nart cosmogony stands as evidence for this. Due largely to geography, they were often politically aligned with Daghestan during the 19th century. As a result, their decorative repetoire could include the entire range of Circassian motifs but also drew on Daghestan styles as well. Sparse engraving and use of niello and gilding were found side by side with extensive engraving, chiselling and large, complex areas of niello. After the Murid Wars, and increasingly into the early 20th century, Chechen work was also distinguishable by a sometimes random combination of these styles, with no particular one prevailing-- sorry to say, as time went on, the workmanship was rarely equal to either of its cultural ancestors. The motifs on the scabbard and lower grip mount of this kindjal are a simplified "spiral vine" often worked in fine relief by Kubachi smiths. Here, it has been deeply engraved into the silver and heavily embellished in niello. Unfortunately, neither the grip buttons nor the central decoration assist in establishing a place of origin as they are all associated-- the buttons from a belt and the central ornament from a horse trapping. This however indicates the paucity of materials in early 20th century Chechnia, and the desire to maintain traditional motifs. It is typical of Chechen weapons which survived the Revolution and First World War. The grip of this dagger is also closely derived from a particularly popular Kubachi type usually rendered entirely in silver, ivory, or a combination thereof. Great store was set by heirloom blades, hence the appearance of an early date on the blade of the kindjal under discussion is not incredible though the mounts clearly postdate it. Caucasian arms, perhaps more than any others save Indonesian, require a great deal of study of individual examples in order to begin to be able to categorize them. The Russian and Turkish museums afford the best selection for the serious student but can be difficult to gain access to. The works of Mrs. Astvatsaturian and Mr. Askhabov are likewise invaluable and now, thanks to the internet, generally available. Posting an image of the mark on the blade would probably be very helpful. Sincerely, Ham