Saudia Jambiya for Identification

Jim McDougall · 20th February 2013, 06:29 PM

Points well taken Lofty, and duly noted. As I had suggested, lets keep the discussion focused on material at hand and observations accordingly. I also think we can offer rebuttal to anyones observations with constructive support without derisive context. I think it is pretty much generally held that any observation or theory is subject to opposing views and new or often conflicting evidence regardless of whether it is perceived as fact or compellingly plausible. In my opinion the courtesy is incumbent on the manner in which that is achieved.
I very much appreciate the items posted and learned input of everyone here, and as noted, think we can keep discussions more helpful without the derisively textured comments.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

20th February 2013, 06:29 PM	#23
Jim McDougall Arms Historian Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Route 66 Posts: 10,278	Points well taken Lofty, and duly noted. As I had suggested, lets keep the discussion focused on material at hand and observations accordingly. I also think we can offer rebuttal to anyones observations with constructive support without derisive context. I think it is pretty much generally held that any observation or theory is subject to opposing views and new or often conflicting evidence regardless of whether it is perceived as fact or compellingly plausible. In my opinion the courtesy is incumbent on the manner in which that is achieved. I very much appreciate the items posted and learned input of everyone here, and as noted, think we can keep discussions more helpful without the derisively textured comments.