Quote:
|
Originally Posted by migueldiaz
very interesting, ron! thanks.
i'm particularly intrigued by the tang's square to semi-round cross section, because this 10th to 15th century visayan kris which was discussed somewhat extensively here in the forum already shows a square cross section (see illustration below).
on the other hand, i don't doubt the antiquity of the kris above.
but i'm no expert on krises. hence this visayan kris is being shown just for additional inputs ... |
Frankly Miguel, i am of the same mind as Alan here that without either a gandik or a gonjo this is not really a kris/keris.
12th August 2012, 07:04 PM
Threaded Mode