![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,843
|
![]()
?????
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,189
|
![]()
Ummmm..........don't think the link works.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,097
|
![]()
Sorry Ben, this isn't working for me either. Can you provide a direct link?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
A direct link isn't possible. I copied the text and picked up the pictures.
I hope I don't brake any rules. If it turned out I did, moderators, please, do your job. Kris E 793 Object type: Other Materials: Gold, rubies, diamonds, iron, nickle, wood Measurements: Thickness: 5 cm. Creator name: unknown Where was it made: Indonesia; Bali Time period: 19th Century Function: Regalia. This State Kris was used in ceremonies to ward off evil through the raksasa (giants) images on the kris. Acquisition: The kris came from Puri Klungkung, Bali. It was taken during a military expedition by the Colonial Government against the Klungkung Kingdom in 1908. The army took the regalia from the King and handed it to the government in Batavia. It was the rule that part of the booty from military expeditions would be given to the National Museum in Batavia and part of it was to be shipped to the Netherlands. Owner: Museum Nasional Why is this a masterpiece The kris was not shipped to the Netherlands but instead remained in Indonesia. This gives it a specific historic value for the museum. History of the object The kris was part of the regalia of the Kingdom of Klungkung in Bali. It shows rakasa (giants) images, which is typically Balinese. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,097
|
![]()
Is that a raksasa or is it Bayu?
Pretty dress with some nice stones. Too bad the pendok was damaged. Looks like nice gold work. It is a shame they don't show us the blade though. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
David,
I think the hilt is Bayu. The text is from the museum itself and it says that the keris has pictures of raksasa on it. Probably in gold. Indeed a shame they didn't make a picture of the blade which is actually the most interesting part of the piece. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 104
|
![]()
I believe that there is only one keris dressed I this manner in existence. It has been in the museum in Jakarta for years. It had been displayed as damaged until it was borrowed by Helen Jessup for a United Stated tour in 1990. It was repaired specifically for this tour. I believe that the photos in the referenced link show the back side of the dress.
Here is a photo of the piece as it was displayed. You can make out the Balinese Kala that is on the front. There is a beautiful picture of the repaired piece on page 162 of Helen Jessup’s “Court Arts of Indonesia” which was published by the Asia Society Galleries, New York as a catalogue of the exhibition. Of further interest there is a picture of a fine old painted Balinese sheath further along in the referenced link. These are possibly more rare than the golden covered pieces. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,189
|
![]()
I agree that this is Battara (
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,097
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,843
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 102
|
![]() Quote:
Wow!!! that is exquisite ! THe stones look of a particulary high quality based on my impression of their translucency? Please don't tell me they are pastes!! Can you give us some details on the stones, the large light blue one looks like topaz, I assume that some of the others are lower grade (jewellery wise) sapphires and rubys?? Forgive my ignorance , but are the processes for gilding plateing of the gold? Cheers mate Jason |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,843
|
![]()
G'day Jason, the stones are rubies, diamonds, black stars, and something else I'm not sure of.
This handle is gold, as in 22ct., not gilded or gold plated. Probably dates from the early 20th century or late 19th century. Was in the possession of the Raja of Badung who passed away in the late 1980's. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 102
|
![]()
blooody hell!
must weigh a fair bit. Magnificent piece, thanks for sharing. Cheers Jason |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,843
|
![]()
Jason, this sort of work, both in gold and in silver, is not cast, it is fabricated, then it is filled with wax and embossed with hammer and punches, when finished the wax is boiled out, and it is filled with resin.
Yes, it is fairly heavy, but the gold is probably no more than an eighth of an inch thick at its thickest part. Don't thank only me, but thank the owner as well. I have his permission to show this piece. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 102
|
![]()
Ahhh, me understand now.
By the way, what are the owners daily travelling movements? ![]() Cheers Jason PS. You might recall I mentioned about my Fiance and our trip in Bali. Well, we are expecting our first child late December!!!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 370
|
![]()
Dear Alan
could you explain the term 'black stars' please. Do you mean a dark sapphire or ruby with a star inclusion which show up when cabachon cut or is it something different? cheers DrD |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,097
|
![]()
David, if it is the "black star" that i am familar with it would be diopside, a fairly inexpensive, though pretty, stone.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,843
|
![]()
Yeah, that's the stuff.
In fact, none of the stones in this handle are particularly valuable, there is a fair bit of gold in the handle, but the thing that sets it apart from other Balinese gold handles is the standard of workmanship:- three different authorities in this field of art have appraised it as the finest work in any gold Balinese handle that they have seen; I myself have never seen any better work. I believe it is probably one of the finest, if not the finest, Balinese keris hilt in existence. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,189
|
![]()
thank you Alan for the explaination of the wax process involved and the pictures.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,097
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,843
|
![]()
Yeah, the one shown in Jessup undoubtedly has much more value in the stones, and the workmanship in the handle (ie, ignoring the wrongko) is also excellent. I think you'd probably need the two handles, side by side, in the hand to make a judgement on which one has the superior workmanship. I know that I have never seen a handle of this type that is of as good quality workmanship as the one I posted pics of, and apparently neither had the three art authorities who appraised it. Actually, when you get into this area of quality, there are very few pieces with which to make comparison.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,097
|
![]()
Sorry Alan, my bad....i thought you were referring to the one in Jessup that started this thread. I now realize that you meant the example that you linked to. Yeah, it would be a tough call to decide which one of these 2 hilts was actually the better one. I certainly couldn't choose based on the pictures alone.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,843
|
![]()
David, whenever we try to evaluate any really superior art work we are faced with this problem. It is not just the quality of the work, or the intrinsic value of the components, it is a certain intangible that only becomes apparent when we are actually face to face with the work in question.
Most often we don't even understand why one piece has a higher impact than the other. So at this level it does not become just a matter of deciding which expression of art is superior to the other in terms of workmanship, technical excellence and intrinsic value, it becomes a matter of trying to understand which piece of art will have the deepest effect on the greatest number of people. Which piece will worm its way into the sub-conscious and strike a chord. Seldom does the power and essence of great art make itself felt through a photograph. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 928
|
![]()
Alan from your picture the handle seems to me a pretty gold handle with a very common subject with a face and body not so expressive (...of course from pictures). About the work's precision the pictures are not so accurate to understand the quality of work.
In my opinion is not gold or "lost wax" to determinate the "soul" of an object but it is the inner power that the artist is able to input in his work. Of course is better to see a nice hilt made by uli emas, rhino horn, uli hijau, uli putith, amber, ecc... ecc...) than common material. For example this my Rawana's brother Bali hit is made by a common poor material (like brass) with real poor stones (amethysts, onyx, moon and star stones) but, in my opinion, it (he) has a great expressive force not only in the face but also in the muscles of body. Last edited by Marcokeris; 19th October 2007 at 02:07 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,843
|
![]()
Marco, I beg your forgiveness, but I am afraid I am unable to understand exactly what you mean in your post commenting on the relative artistic qualities of the handle of which you have provided a photo, and the gold handle of which I posted some pictures.
I do not understand:- "--- uli emas, -------------, uli hijau, uli putith, ---" I do not understand your comment:- "---In my opinion is not gold or "lost wax" to determinate the "soul" of an object---". I cannot understand your comparison of the handles made by court goldsmiths to the Raja of Klungkung, and the Raja of Badung, with the recently made handle of some other material that has been made for the popular market, and of which you have provided a photo. I freely admit that I may be a little stupid in my lack of understanding, but I would truly appreciate it if you could expand your comments in order to assist my understanding of just what it is that you trying to say. Thank you for your consideration. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,097
|
![]()
Sorry Marco, i am afraid i share Alan's confusion. I am having a hard time putting your example in the same room as the other hilts being discussed here.
Here is another Bali gold hilt i find interesting from the Adrien Noe collection. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,843
|
![]()
Goodness me.
That is seriously nice. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,097
|
![]()
Here's a few more angles.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|