Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22nd September 2017, 03:58 AM   #1
alexish
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 127
Default Antique Minangkabau Keris for Comments

Dear Forum Members,

I have just won an auction for an antique Minangkabau keris advertised to be from the 18th century.

I hereby attach pictures for your comments.

Do you believe that this keris is actually 200 years old? I have my doubts, and think that a more probable date of its manufacture would be from the late 19th to early 20th century.
Attached Images
            
alexish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2017, 05:18 PM   #2
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
Post

Quote:
Do you believe that this keris is actually 200 years old? I have my doubts, and think that a more probable date of its manufacture would be from the late 19th to early 20th century.
This may not be the best nor oldest Minang piece I've seen. The blade certainly has its merits though: I do like the fuller work! Blade quality is certainly above average by Minang standards.

I don't think we have any robust framework to reliably date keris Minang. The blade may well be from the 19th century (or possibly older).

The fittings are certainly younger - your estimate seems plausible to me; the restoration with wire is even later and the silver band looks like a recent replacement; the selut appears to be 20th c., too.

IMHO a nice and interesting example - congrats!

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2017, 05:30 AM   #3
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,123
Default

The more i look at this keris the less it looks Minangkabau to me. The pendokok perhaps, but the rest of the dress looks wrong and the blade looks even less likely. It's a nice one though.
Age is always tricky. I would feel safe with 19th century, but would say 18th century was not impossible.
May i enquire how long the blade is?

Last edited by David; 23rd September 2017 at 05:50 PM.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2017, 08:25 AM   #4
alexish
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 127
Default

The overall length including handle and sheath is about 43 cm.
alexish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2017, 08:28 AM   #5
alexish
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 127
Default South Sumatra

Quote:
Originally Posted by David
The more i look at this keris the less it looks Minangkabau to me. The pendokok perhaps, but the rest of the dress looks wrong and the blade looks even less likely. It's a nice one though.
Age is always tricky. I would feel safe with 19th century, but would say 18th century was impossible.
May i enquire how long the blade is?
Dear David,

Would you be confident that the keris originate from Southern Sumatra?

The blade appears to be similiar to that of Keris Palembang?
alexish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2017, 10:07 AM   #6
Jean
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
Default

I feel exactly the same as David.
Regards
Jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2017, 12:44 PM   #7
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
Default

Hello David,

Quote:
The more i look at this keris the less it looks Minangkabau to me. The pendokok perhaps, but the rest of the dress looks wrong and the blade looks even less likely. It's a nice one though.
Wasn't going to open that can of worms...

I agree that the selut/pendokok - considering that it is usually easy to change - lends the weakest support for placing an ensemble. The scabbard would probably fit well with Riau or possibly eastern Sumatra.

I assume the blade to be rather small and I've seen Minang blades with isolated features resembling this example; need to look for any pics though.

The Minang traveled widely and it's not rare to see "mixed" examples. What other origin would you consider this blade being from?


Quote:
Age is always tricky. I would feel safe with 19th century, but would say 18th century was impossible.
I assume you meant to type:
"..., but would not say 18th century was impossible."

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2017, 03:11 PM   #8
Jean
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kai
What other origin would you consider this blade being from?

Regards,
Kai
Hi Kai,
Do you know any proven specimen of a Minang blade with a curved ganja?
Regards
Jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2017, 05:50 PM   #9
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kai
I assume you meant to type:
"..., but would not say 18th century was impossible."

Regards,
Kai
Thanks Kai, that is indeed what i had intended to write. I have edited mu p[ost now to reflect that.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2017, 06:58 PM   #10
GIO
Member
 
GIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 313
Default

Am I wrong or the blade has been shortened or reshaped ? It seems that the tip points at the wrong direction.
GIO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2017, 08:36 PM   #11
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GIO
Am I wrong or the blade has been shortened or reshaped ? It seems that the tip points at the wrong direction.
You are not wrong Gio. Probably some length lost to erosion. Keris luks should always be odd and an even count of luks is most often due to lost length of the blade for one reason or another.

Last edited by David; 25th September 2017 at 07:31 PM.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2017, 04:52 PM   #12
GIO
Member
 
GIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David
You are not wrong Gio. Probably some length lost to erosion. Keris luks should be od and an even count of luks is most often due to lost length of the blade for one reason or another.
Thanks for your suggestion, David. In fact I have never considered this aspect.
GIO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2017, 07:35 PM   #13
kulbuntet
Member
 
kulbuntet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 159
Default

Hi there,

Never the less the outcome of the origin and so on, nice blade. I agree with the others, that it is unlikely Minangkabau. And even not sure that the blade originated from Sumatra, but also not sure enough to provide good facts that it does not. Could you see if the grip is loose? And could you post a photo of the blade with tip up without the hulu, and one good close up of the peksi? This could give us some information. I am wondering if there are marks of the peksi been shortened, broken or intended the length it is.

Regards Michel
kulbuntet is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.