![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,333
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
![]()
Maybe Tibetan or Persian. The pommel reminds me of Persian ones, and the flowers/foliage do not look Tibetan to me, but the guard area? Kinzhalesque? Quick surface thoughts.....whatever it is, I've seen one before....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,086
|
![]()
I am away from my references at the moment but my best guess at this time is that this is an Arab sword, possibly from Oman.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
![]()
You may be right; what I'm grasping for with the lidsheath/guard may be a similarity to the lidsheath/ferule/guard on jambiya. In fact, now that you say Arab, I think you are probably right. I've definitely seen this very form before, I may have a picture in a book, but my books are in my car, I'm nude, and it's raining.....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 371
|
![]()
The style is almost indo-persian, with both arabic and Indian influences, with the foliage favoring the former.
At a glance the impression was oriental, but looking closer quickly dispells that. SWEET find and subtely different than most I've seen. Mike |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
![]()
Swords and Hilt Weapons by North, Coe, Connolly, et al. Page 141 an extremely similar sword, unfortuneately IDd only as one of a "Group of Turkish and Persian swords and daggers with silver mounts and blades inlaid with gold, sixteenth-eighteenth century." A less similar but still similar sword is on page 139, IDd as Hispano-Mooresque c. 1500.....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,333
|
![]()
Good eye Tom .
Just looked at the example in Swords and Hilt Weapons ; a much nicer example . Makes me wonder if our example is a 'decorative' piece from a later era. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|