![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Gentlemen,
Here is a sword belonging to a group I love very much: a mystery. The handle is very much Nimcha-like, but made of tropical wood (Not North African, of course ![]() The blade looks like a Thai Dha, very good quality, tempered and hand-made. The blade was very wobbly and disconnected easily. The cavity was filled with remnants of some very old, crumbly, almost black petrified substance (like tulwars) adhering both to the tang and to the handle. Took me some time to remove it completely to assure good fit. The scabbard is interesting: it is not cylindrical, like on Thai/Burmese swords, but flat, resembling Malay, Indonesian, Philippine samples. It is surrounded by brass circular fastenings. It is in a sorry shape, but was obviously made for this blade, as it fits perfectly well. In general, the entire sword is well made, careful work, nice fits; definitely not a "dog's breakfast" assembly of unrelated parts. Can we make sense out of it? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
Lots of trees in N.Africa Ariel.
olive, Accacia, walnut, orance, evergreen oak, lemon, etc.etc. Spiral |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,774
|
![]()
Looking at the wood from your pictures, the grip and the scabbard seem to be of the same wood. Certainly the grip will have been fondled more frequently
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 520
|
![]()
The blade looks indonesian to me. The blade shape similar to a parang Langgai Tinggang or some parang naibor.
http://www.oriental-arms.co.il/photo...00850/ph-0.jpg http://old.blades.free.fr/swords/day...ayak_intro.htm I had seen some other blades with the saif ( nimcha ) type handles and Jim posted this about it "These Moroccan swords with complex guards were known from at least the earlier 17th century in the Maghreb (which included the Moroccan littoral as far as Algeria)and the hilts are believed to have developed from early Italian sabres via Arab trade.From those times, these were typically mounted with varying forms of trade blades" I hope he sees this for I would be interested in seeing what he thinks of it Whatever it is, its a great find and a rarity congratulations Last edited by RhysMichael; 8th October 2006 at 08:59 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,774
|
![]()
Yes, perhaps it is SE Asian. Just like one sees talwar type grips, maybe this is another "Islamic" influence grip, just happens to be seen more frequently in N Africa.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 1,243
|
![]()
Yeah, the overall shape of the blade, the scabbard and also the red color on the handle, remembers to me a "strange" parang nabor.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,286
|
![]()
Blade length, hilt length ?
Could be a N. African sword . The thing looks like a boarding cutlass to me . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Sorry, I got poetic and forgot about the "academic" part
The handle is 5.5 inches long; the blade is 23" long and a tad more than 2" wide (close to the point). I do not have it's weight without scabbard, with scabbard and scabbard separately. This will surely disqualify it from ever being written up in an " academic" book ![]() ![]() On a more serious note, it is superbly balanced and a pleasure to hold and to wield. Another thing: it is not sharpened for the first 5-7 inches, but after that .... you can shave with it! It does have a resemblance to naval cutlasses but could just as well be used elsewhere. I thought about it being a variant of Nabur, but I have never seen one with a Nimcha handle, most of them had knuckleguards and the blade looks and feels Thai. Southern Thailand, with sizeable Muslim population? Were Thai blades exported to nearby countries? Which brings us back to a discussion we once had: what determines the provemance or a general classificaton of a sword: the handle or the blade? Say, we have a sword with a typical Nabur handle and a Yataghan blade. Where did it come from from the usage point of view? Shall we say it is a Borneo Parang Nabur with an Ottoman Yataghan blade or an Ottoman Yataghan with a SE Asian handle? Following Polish tradition, I would vote for the former. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|