![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 462
|
![]()
think you this DHA
is this a tourist piece or not? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,731
|
![]()
IMHO No not tourist. These are often referred to as Temple Dha and come in varying lengths. The decoration and inscriptions usually, (but not always) relate to the life of Buddha. Check this link http://dharesearch.bowditch.us/ and go to "sword index" at bottom of home page. You will see similar there.
Stu |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 462
|
![]() Quote:
looks like the number 0011 Thank you very much |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
My opinion considers both mentioned as post WWII touristic examples, examples likley made and sold to bring money in to temples and local communities.
Gavin Last edited by SwordsAntiqueWeapons; 28th July 2013 at 11:53 AM. Reason: more detail |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
How do you define "tourist"?
IMHO, if objects are mass-produced , use cheap materials ( these Dhas use white-metal alloys and low-quality steel), standard and crudely-made decorations ( look at the hammered details on the scabbard), are new ( look at the wood), and are widely sold in souvenir shops, - then they are "tourist-grade". The direction of profits, - temple, community center, private accounts, - is irrelevant. It is the object that is judged, not the intent of its sale. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 413
|
![]() Quote:
The link http://dharesearch.bowditch.us/ is no longer accessible because the domain has expired. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 413
|
![]()
Agreed these named "Temple" dhas are mid 20th Century. They are a variant of "Story" dhas, which also have images on the blade. Temple dhas are unique in that they show the life story of Buddha.
The evidence is anecdotal AFIK for the Temple Dha. Here is what I've heard:
Regardless, the objects have their own beauty. Mine is dutifully sharp, fascinating to look at and to hold, and if held to a standard of practicality, it would do ok (not great, but ok). Tourist item? Maybe. As Burma/Myanmar opens to the world, perhaps we will learn more. Best Regards, Dave A. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|