Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 20th December 2005, 10:40 PM   #1
Robert
EAAF Staff
 
Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
Default Nice Spanish Colonial Sword

Nice Spanish Colonial sword with brass guard and fittings the butt plate is faceted. The grip is carved horn in the shape of a horse hoof. The pictures that I have at the present do not do the carving justice. Thanks for looking and all comments on this sword are welcome.

Blade length is 20-7/8 inches
Blade width at widest point is 1-1/8 inches
Blade thickness at the hilt is 1/4 inch
Hilt length is 5-7/8 inches


Robert
Attached Images
   
Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2005, 01:15 AM   #2
Chris Evans
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 682
Default

Hi Robert,

Why do you think that it is Spanish colonial? And if so, from where?

Cheers
Chris
Chris Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2005, 03:20 AM   #3
Robert
EAAF Staff
 
Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
Default

Hi Chris,
IMHO this sword is from the Philippines around the end of the 19th to early 20th century. It think that it is probably from Luzon. The styling shows a lot of European influence that to me looks Spanish. If I am wrong about any of this the experts here on the forum will hopefully correct me. Here is another sword from my collection of similar styling.
Attached Images
  
Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2005, 05:47 AM   #4
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,225
Default

I would agree that both pieces, Robert, are Luzon. I like the first one best due to the carved hilt - very perdy. I would say that the blade was from a cut down Spanish sword - not unheard of during the turn of the century.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2005, 08:04 AM   #5
Robert
EAAF Staff
 
Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
Default

Battara,
I agree that the first one with the carved hilt does look quite a bit better than the second but the second one to me seems like a more practical weapon to carry into battle. The blades on both swords are almost identical. The main difference is the bevel on the top edge of the first sword. One other thing I might mention is that in the pictures of the first sword it looks like it has a fuller, but that is just an optical illusion caused by the camera and lighting. As soon as my daughter brings my camera back "again" I will take pictures of them both side by side. Hopefully I will be able to take better pictures of the hilt because like I said earlier these pictures don't do the carving justice. I thank you very much for your opinion on these.


Robert
Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2005, 09:20 AM   #6
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,225
Default

So this is a lighting effect? W W! Ok, well, that changes some things aboiut the blade then.

Regarding Luzon blades, especially Tagalog and Ilocano, they will not be a beefy as Moro. The fighting styles were different. In the north, Luzon, they were more influenced by Spanish espada y daga and in this one uses a long sword and a dagger. The bolos were more used like this than for chopping like the Moro barung or kampilan, or even the talibon. They were effective, but in different ways.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2005, 05:45 AM   #7
Chris Evans
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 682
Default

Hi Robert,


Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Coleman
Hi Chris,
IMHO this sword is from the Philippines around the end of the 19th to early 20th century. It think that it is probably from Luzon. The styling shows a lot of European influence that to me looks Spanish. If I am wrong about any of this the experts here on the forum will hopefully correct me. Here is another sword from my collection of similar styling.
When you said Spanish colonial, my mind immediately went to Sth America., but of course, the Philippines were also a Spanish colony.

I have never seen anything like it in Latin America and since I know zilch about Filipino weapons, I'll bow out.

As an aside, at least as far as the blade and the quillons go, that would be considered a "facon", that is a large knife/dagger, in Sth America, rather than a sword.

Have a great Xmas and happy new year


Cheers
Chris
Chris Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.