![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,773
|
![]()
I got this magpie fashion. Not my sort of thing but I fell for the clean lines. At first glance it appears to be a converted bayonet. However I am not so sure. The scabbard has been made for the blade and seems to my eye to be different to the Martini bayonet scabbard I do not know? It is certainly not shed work, made by a professional hand? The handle is turned black wood a kind of ebony. The blade is 27cm long. It is not unheard of to see bayonet type knife blades. You can only stab with it. Dagger nuts oppinions?
Last edited by Tim Simmons; 7th May 2012 at 04:48 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 97
|
![]()
It"s got the trench knife look about it .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,773
|
![]()
You may well be right. I forgot to mention. If you look very close at the handle, you can see that the handle is secured by two screws one either side. One further up the handle from the other. I have been checking bayonets, and the fullers run from tip to forte. The fullers on this dagger end a good inch before the forte. I think you are correct about ww1 private purchase, officer sort of thing. Many daggers knives and dirks were made for ww1. Though how many were actually used is another question. Sadley I will be unable too show but through x10 loop the screws look hand made. Thank you.
Last edited by Tim Simmons; 7th May 2012 at 05:51 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,773
|
![]()
Or quite possibly and not at all unreasonable a mid 19th century naval dirk. I have been researching what bayonet this could have been made from if that is the case, and I have been unable to find one with the correct sizing profile and fullering. The bold use of brass is also a very naval thing. ???? Interesting link.
http://asoac.org/bulletins/86_tuuite_naval.pdf Last edited by Tim Simmons; 8th May 2012 at 07:31 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,087
|
![]()
There is a chance it could be naval, but I don't think so. Most of the naval dirks were made for midshipmen and officers, therefore, better quality. That's not to say this could have been made out of necessity during desparate times. I'm thinking it dates post-1850 (based on the simple cross guard piece that was cut in this pattern), so it conceivably could be a Confed dirk, side-knife. It could also be a so-called gambler's boot knife (I've seen some of this quality). If naval (and I say a big IF), it's post Age of Sail when dirks were falling out of favor. Sailors still carried knives, but they were typically blunt/no point for cutting rope or of the clasp knife type during this period. Could still be a trench knife, of course. In any case, a very interesting piece that raises questions...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,773
|
![]()
Thank you. Here is the rub "quality" is fancy quality? I make all sorts of metal fittings for a great deal of objects and I have "issues" about design, taste, and concepts of "quality" perhaps I have been in the trade too long and have become a little jaded.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|