|
1st October 2008, 01:25 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
Ethiopian Shield #3
The third shield, a more common variety. Opinions?
|
1st October 2008, 01:31 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
I know nothing of these shields Bill , they looik good though But pure intrest & curiosity means I must ask what thickness are they? Great finds I am sure...
Spiral |
1st October 2008, 01:55 AM | #3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,945
|
I believe thats Galla, from Ethiopia...got one identical to it. Don't think I have the notes with me, but think it was Lake Tana region.
|
1st October 2008, 04:59 AM | #4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: OKLAHOMA, USA
Posts: 3,138
|
NICE SHIELDS
MY UNDERSTANDING IS THESE ARE USUALLY MADE FROM HIPPO OR BUFFALOW HIDE IN THE SOUTHERN, CENTRAL REGION OF ETHIOPIA. I DON'T KNOW THE REASON FOR THE LARGE BUMP DESIGNS BUT THEY ARE TYPICAL FOR THIS TYPE OF SHIELD. THE ONE I HAVE AS WELL AS OTHERS I HAVE SEEN ARE LARGE, THICK AND HEAVY AND WOULD OFFER GOOD PROTECTION FROM EDGED WEAPONS. SOME HAVE A FLAT EDGE AND OTHERS HAVE A ROLLED EDGE TO BETTER RESIST A CUT TO THE SHIELD EDGE. THE EXAMPLE I HAVE WAS COLLECTED IN ADDIS ABABA ETHIOPIA. I HAD NOT SEEN THE METAL DESIGNS ON THE OLD EXAMPLES I HAVE SEEN IN THE PAST SO THAT MAY BE A MORE RECENT ARTISTIC INNOVATION, BUT IT DOES LOOK GOOD. FOR MORE INFORMATION SEE PAGES 102 THRU 105 IN "SHIELDS Africa, Southeast Asia and Oceania" by Prestel. from the collections of the Barbier- Mueller Museum. it is a good book on shields. |
1st October 2008, 08:04 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,807
|
Splendid.
|
1st October 2008, 09:14 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,225
|
Pretty common shield.
But pretty attractive too |
1st October 2008, 08:45 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,430
|
A real shield - usually they have a turned-up rim, looking at it carefully perhaps it has been trimmed down around the circumference for some reason. (But I have seen others that look similar).
Regards |
|
|