![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,063
|
![]()
Seeing as Chinese Jian are a current topic I thought I would post mine. Not in the best of condition, some damage to the scabbard but the sword is sound.
I bought it some time ago out of the proceeds of a nice unexpected windfall, and then put it in a cupboard and forgot about it. Vendors photos. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
A good honest older pair.
There is still much speculation about the true origins of these, not referring to China, that is a given, but the period they were made. Some feel they are late 19th/early 20th century, made enmass for trade were occupying forces were concerned and those that followed after. Other senior and long time collectors of Jian, indicate earlier, and that the type were a standard political gift of the 19th century. What is known is that they are found in dagger size, mid sized and on the very rare occasion full length... the mid sized being the most common and that they are seen as singles or doubles. Both are plausible explanations and to date I am yet to see anything other than circumstantial evidence for either train of thought. When I consider the type based on tensile blade strength and quality of detail in the fittings, I feel the older side of hypothesis. These types all come with a very strong hard blade, not an easy thing to bend over your knee like some of the later Qing examples... The factory where these were made did cater for large volumes and a rather standardised type... beyond that, to quote the x-files, the truth is out there... but who is going to find it??? Further notes after posting. A proper forensic analysis of the manufacture materials may reveal more. As seen under the losses of the veneer, the timbers are painted yellow... this would be a prime thing to have analysed and I have a spare scabbard here with losses if anyone does want to venture down this road. Last edited by Gavin Nugent; 9th March 2023 at 01:52 AM. Reason: Additional insights |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 471
|
![]()
I'll add my (slightly worn) twins to this thread. Same style fittings, though in my case the scabbard is plain wood (not sure if it ever had the turtle covering; if it did none of it remains) and the grips have been painted red. Since the scabbard isn't covered you can see the three slats it's made out of.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,249
|
![]() Quote:
Many of these also pop up among Chinese expat communities all over SE Asia. Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,249
|
![]()
Dimensions including thickness and weight would be great - thanks, all!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 471
|
![]()
Weight in scabbard 1049g, outside scabbard: 385g (left), 379g (right)
Length in scabbard: 59cm Length outside scabbard: both 57cm, 42cm blades measured from the inside of the hilt (or 40.5cm measured from the outside scabbard cover protrusion) They taper slightly in thickness and profile until the last 2cm or so, one a bit more than the other (which explains the slight difference in weight). Width / thickness at the guard: 32mm / 5mm Width / thickness halfway down the blade: 29mm / 4mm Width / thickness 2cm before the tip: 22mm / 3.5mm (right), 4mm (left) EDIT: POB between 9.5-10cm from the inner guard. Last edited by werecow; 9th March 2023 at 02:38 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,063
|
![]()
This one, a single blade in the scabbard and made that way. Total length of sword 56 cm, blade length 42 cm. Weight in scabbard 516 gms, sword alone 344 gms.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|