|
30th October 2010, 11:14 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Expensive Indian Khanjar
$3,725
Can not load files. Am I missing something? http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...T#ht_736wt_950 |
31st October 2010, 12:21 AM | #2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
Here ya go. Is it just me or does the hilt look like it is on up-side down?
Robert |
31st October 2010, 12:57 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
Hmm... It looks all wrong to me.
|
31st October 2010, 05:07 AM | #4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,225
|
I thought about getting in but it went way over my head. Got some better stuff in the works anyway.
Now that you mention it, the hilt does look like it is on backwards, doesn't it? |
31st October 2010, 06:05 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
The scabbard is very, very new, and similar hilts are sold on e-bay from India for ~$300.
Throw in a tube of Crazy Glue and .... well, that's a higher interest rate than what my bank offers:-) |
31st October 2010, 02:12 PM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
Quote:
Blade looks OK, like the collar, be nice to see close-ups, scabbard looks like it's possibly late 19th/early 20th, hilt is very well carved, nice piercing, could be legit? But to lay out that kind of cash on pictures of that quality |
|
31st October 2010, 05:25 PM | #7 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,293
|
I'm not overwhelmed by the level of workmanship in the blade .
Could be old and just poor work . Agree about the ca$h expenditure based on a few electrons ........ |
1st November 2010, 05:18 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,893
|
If it were possible to investigate this dagger I believe it would be found that the blade is wootz, with a piece of iron lap welded to the hilt end to form the tang.
Apparently this was not at all uncommon in Indian court daggers. I believe the blade has been removed and re-mounted upside down. The hilt which I assume is jade appears to have been damaged in the area of the pommel. Here are pics of two similar daggers which came out of India in about 1920 and which have been appraised as Mughal, probably 17th century, by three separate people, one in USA, one in UK, and one in Australia. |
10th December 2010, 03:22 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
Alan, I second your opinion. The hilt looks like nephrite jade, not aventurine. moreover, does not look anything like modern "mughal" work seen on eBay and elsewhere. overall, quite decent quality hilt. and if it is jade indeed - a rare, potentially 18/19 C, bargain. attached is similarly shaped hilt.
|
|
|