Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 21st January 2011, 01:44 AM   #1
henri
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 81
Default Balato

Last one brought into my luggages last week .

Not cleaned yet but probably recent .Difficult to estimate age .... Ball is a new one made in wood but interesting hilt.
Any comments always welcomed !

Henri
Attached Images
        
henri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2011, 09:32 AM   #2
Nagawarrior
Member
 
Nagawarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Inland Empire, Southern California USA
Posts: 160
Default

I like henri. As I understand it, most of these are recent. The old ones from the Headhunting times(pre-1887) are very rare indeed. Some concider the old ones the only "real" swords, all other are tourist. Do a forum search and see what I mean, not a pretty picture in some cases. Mine is my Wife's favorite sword in my collection, whether its old or not, its pretty. Its all in the eye of the beholder.






Nagawarrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2011, 12:58 PM   #3
asomotif
Member
 
asomotif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,225
Default

Hello Henri,

Although the ball has wooden teeth the whole ensemble looks original and the patina does not look fake to me.
So this may be a post WW2 example for ceremonial use

For the right price I would not mind to bump into one of these.
Sad enough to often such items are presented as antique at a too high price.
asomotif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2011, 10:39 PM   #4
Mytribalworld
Member
 
Mytribalworld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by henri
Last one brought into my luggages last week .

Not cleaned yet but probably recent .Difficult to estimate age .... Ball is a new one made in wood but interesting hilt.
Any comments always welcomed !

Henri
Hi Henry,

Your balato looks to me as a post WW2 piece but seems to be good carved with some style variations typical for that time.
I think its a piece from the 70's or so with less patina and what they sadly did was adding a black ugly patina to make it look older ( so more expensive)
I think they did that by painting and burning( the wet paint), it looks a little crusty.

however I mostly don't advice to clean old weaponery I think the piece will look much better if you clean the hilt very carefully with steelwool.

regards Arjan
Mytribalworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2011, 12:03 AM   #5
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,220
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mandaukudi
I think they did that by painting and burning( the wet paint), it looks a little crusty.

however I mostly don't advice to clean old weaponery I think the piece will look much better if you clean the hilt very carefully with steelwool.
What about the ball of "tusks" on the scabbard?
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2011, 11:04 AM   #6
Mytribalworld
Member
 
Mytribalworld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Battara
What about the ball of "tusks" on the scabbard?
if it was my sword I should remove the ball completely or remove the wooden tusks ( carefully ) and try to hunt for some real tusks on ebay or so.

wooden tusks wheren't used on Nias, the reason why they added tusks on the ball was by the ideas of animistic belief to load up the sword ( or actually the ball) with power as teeth,horns etc are fastgrowers.
it shouldn't have not any sense to add wooden replica's

in original old charmsballs the tusks are often elongated with wooden pegs to make them round around the ball. ( I will see if I can find a pic)

Arjan
Mytribalworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2011, 07:01 PM   #7
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,220
Default

Thank you. Did not realize they were wooden.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2011, 07:38 PM   #8
asomotif
Member
 
asomotif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mandaukudi
if it was my sword I should remove the ball completely or remove the wooden tusks ( carefully ) and try to hunt for some real tusks on ebay or so.
Hi Arjan,
It is on scarce occasions that we differ

But is this case I would advise not to alter the ball.
It is a mid 20th century balato that was either made for ceremonial dancing or maybe as a tourist item.
But it is not an old pre 1900 headhunters sword.
So why change the balato into an old (pre 1900) sword which it simply is not.

Last edited by asomotif; 23rd January 2011 at 08:20 PM.
asomotif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2011, 10:50 PM   #9
henri
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 81
Default

Thank you all for your feed backs . Still this dilemma : change / alter or not change the ball ? I could easily find here boar tusks and replace just the wooden tusks . Will look better for sure ...but still not an old one . Anyway it s always a compromise !

Cheers

Henri
henri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2011, 01:22 PM   #10
Mytribalworld
Member
 
Mytribalworld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asomotif
Hi Arjan,
It is on scarce occasions that we differ

But is this case I would advise not to alter the ball.
It is a mid 20th century balato that was either made for ceremonial dancing or maybe as a tourist item.
But it is not an old pre 1900 headhunters sword.
So why change the balato into an old (pre 1900) sword which it simply is not.
Willem, it was not the intension to "alter" the piece and its also not the case that "only" the pre 1900 headhuntersswords has real tusk charmballs.
also after the WW2 we see "warriors" on Nias walking around with tusks charmballs. Its more that I have strongly the idea that such balls are added on Bali to sell them as complete sword.
than it should be more ethographical correct to add real tusks than let the "Bali ball"" where it is now, I think.
But of course if you want to see the sword in its original state you shouldn't add anything.

Arjan
Attached Images
 
Mytribalworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.