|
5th January 2015, 09:49 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
Ottoman Dharia
Another Ottoman Dharia from Hijaz, from a Forum member
similar to these ones http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ighlight=kubur yours, Kubur |
6th January 2015, 05:04 AM | #2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,497
|
Quote:
|
|
6th January 2015, 03:19 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
Yep
Have a look on recent (or even) old books on Islamic arms. You will see the same kind of blades and the same design on scabbards of daggers and swords attributed to the Ottomans and 19th c. The criteria are the quality of the blade, the decorations on the blade, the decorations and motives on the handle and scabbard... The Ottomans ruled the Hijaz up to Yemen. Now my question is : This kind of dagger - dharia - Is it a local model 'reinvented' by the Ottomans living in Arabia? Or the Ottomans brought with them this model of dagger who was then adopted by the locals in Arabia? |
6th January 2015, 08:05 PM | #4 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
Quote:
Has the script been translated? That may prove interesting! spiral |
|
7th January 2015, 12:22 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,741
|
You MAY be correct in calling this an Ottoman Dharia, but to me the SCABBARD STYLE with the middle section of material (velvet??)covering, suggests Indian influence.
Stu |
7th January 2015, 01:24 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 80
|
Attached are some photos of another example. The style of the silverwork coupled with the blade construction (the fortes of the blade being parallel with the handle and not beginning to angle at the ricasso like many Arabian daggers do) point it to being an Ottoman interpretation of a southern Arabian dharia jambiya, though I think one could call this example a khanjar as well. However in the absence of this style of silver work in Arabian examples, I would suggest that points it to someone who trained or worked in the Anatolian peninsula but was familiar with the forms of the Arabian peninsula. I think that form is easier to copy than decorative motifs meaning the chances of an Arabian silversmith working in the 19th C. Ottoman floral silver decorative style is less likely than an Anatolian or rather non-Arabian silversmith adapting a common Arabian form with Ottoman floral design.
Also the blade is Ottoman workmanship, highlighted by the stylized Turkish style koftgari work. The example that Kubur displays shows some sign of Sindh or Oudh style work (is the example brass or copper?), and they most certainly did adopt Arabian styles for local interpretation with Indian chiseled motifs and bright gilding. Arguing against myself and Kubur, see Wilkinson, Swords and Daggers (1967) plate 161 and 162 for another example. He notes it to be Arabian (Wahhabite) but then claims that the Kurdish jambiya in the same plate is Albanian... |
|
|