Medieval hand cannons -- asian?

[Ed]

My interests have gotten rather more catholic over the past few years than less, I fear.

One area that has really gotten my attention is that of ancient firearms. I've always been a fancier of Mons Meg (but then, who isn't?) but I have become more interested in smaller objects.

European hand firearms are amply represented in museums as you can see here:

These from Leeds.

Now, I have come across a number of examples that look like this:


European? Asian?

I have to tell you that there are any number of objects just like those in the second picture in European museums.

Interesting area, no?

[katana]

Interesting topic Ed ,

These pictures are from a manuscript produced between 1495 and 1515. It shows the artillery of the Habsburg monarch, Kaiser Maximilian I

Regards David

[Ed]

bump for our expanded readership.

[migueldiaz]

Hi Ed and David,

Interesting topic, thanks!

At the West Point Museum, I snapped this pic of a 19th century Filipino hand cannon. Kindly note that in its description, the design supposedly dates back to the 15th century.

We will note also that the Filipino hand cannon's design is very much similar to one of the pics David posted above (and posted again below).

The first Europeans landed in the Philippines in the 1500s (starting with Ferdinand Magellan in 1521). Assuming that the hand cannon design originated from Europe, then the usage of the hand cannon by Filipinos may have started as early the mid-1500s.

On the other hand since gunpowder must have first been invented in China, it may also be possible that the development of the hand cannon of the type pictured below was Asian in origin.

The other type of hand cannon that was extensively used in southern Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia was the lantaka. Its photo appears at the bottom, below.

Regards.

[Ed]

Thank you for your thoughts.

An incorrect assumption is that Iron was not worked at an early date in China and that any barrel that is of iron would, necessarily, have to have been made in Europe. This is wrong as I discovered in conversations with various folks who have expertise in eastern technology.

The identification of these sorts of barrels remains an open question.

[Ed]

The illustration is from an early work on Chinese military matters. The forms ore identicle to those seen on weapons identified as european.

Trade, perhaps? But from where to where?

[katana]

Interesting picture Ed,
the 'rings' on the cannon ......re-inforcement, 'cooling' fins or perhaps duel purpose .....I wonder ???

Regards David

[migueldiaz]

Originally Posted by katana

Interesting picture Ed, the 'rings' on the cannon ......re-inforcement, 'cooling' fins or perhaps duel purpose .....I wonder ???

Ed, interesting image indeed.

David, the rings would appear to me as reinforcements primarily.

And I believe it's because the ancient Chinese cannons and European cannons must have shared the same construction methodology -- the barrel was made from several thick slats of metal, then bound together with rings.

In fact the word "barrel" [of a gun or cannon] is a very descriptive term, historically -- a gun barrel then was made in a very similar fashion vis-a-vis how a barrel [container] was made.

[migueldiaz]

This must have been the very first hand cannon ever --

"The oldest extant cannon that we have is a bronze cannon from the Yuan dynasty, with an inscription dated 1332. It is 35.3cm long, with a calibre of 10.5cm and a weight of 6.94kg. The inscription also tells us that it was cannon number 300 in its frontier guard unit, showing that such cannons were manufactured and deployed in large numbers."

The full article can be found here.

[migueldiaz]

Originally Posted by Ed

Thank you for your thoughts.

An incorrect assumption is that Iron was not worked at an early date in China and that any barrel that is of iron would, necessarily, have to have been made in Europe. This is wrong as I discovered in conversations with various folks who have expertise in eastern technology.

The identification of these sorts of barrels remains an open question.

Hi Ed,

Thanks for the comments.

Yes, it looks like the Chinese started with a bamboo cannon (early 12th century), and not a metal one.

However, the Chinese quickly 'graduated' to a metal-barreled cannon by the late 12th century --

"Gunpower: Along with the silk and paper, gunpowder is another invention by Chinese and the Silk Road helped it spread to the west. The dating of gunpowder is as early as 850 A.D. ... The gunpowder used for military purpose was first recorded in 919 A.D. By the 11th century, explosive bombs filled with gunpowder and fired from catapults were introduced and used in China. The words "fire cannon", "rocket", "missile" and "fireball" appeared time and again in the official Song history as well as two other books written during the same period. The first detailed description of using "firing cannon" in warfare was in connection with a battle fought in 1126 when the Song army used it against the invading Nuchens. The so-called fire cannon was a tube made of bamboo filled with gunpowder which, when fired, threw a flaming missile towards the enemy ... According to a description of a battle scene in 1132, it took two persons to carry a "fire cannon" ...

"The early account of gunpowder in Europe was recorded by English philosopher Roger Bacon in the 13th century. One century later the Arabs used it to attack the Spanish town Baza and the very next year in 1326 Florence ordered the manufacturing of cannon and cannon balls. From Italy the making of gunpowder soon spread to other European countries, and by the 1350s it had become an effective weapon on the battlefield.

"Origin of Gun: The Chinese adapted their primitive catapults to eventually develop a true gun with a metal barrel, gunpowder and a projectile by the 12th century. It is believed that the first gun was found in the early 1970s at Pan-la-ch'eng-tzu village, Manchuria, and dated to around 1290 A.D."

The picture below are samples of the earliest cannons of ancient China.