Oriental sword

[Multumesc]

Hello.Dear friends, please help me and me about this sword.I'd like to know which countries belong and how old it is.Thank you very much.

[Multumesc]

[estcrh]

Originally Posted by Multumesc

Hello.Dear friends, please help me and me about this sword.I'd like to know which countries belong and how old it is.Thank you very much.

Your sword is an Indian tulwar, it would be considered as an "Indo-Persian" sword instead of an "Oriental" sword. Maybe another forum member can add some additional information such as age or region.

[Oliver Pinchot]

This tulwar is purely Indian, and looks to be an arsenal sword of the early 20th century. Good point regarding attribution there, Estcrh. The term "Oriental" has long since been superseded. We can even take it a step further:

In the 19th century, Wilbrahim Egerton, among others, used the term Indo-Persian to refer to weapons made in India, primarily though not exclusively by the Mughals, which to a greater or lesser extent were based on Persian prototypes. These may be precise copies of Persian work but for a particular Mughal characteristic, or distinctly Indian but showing a degree of Persian influence. A good example of an Indo-Persian sword would be the Mughal shamshir pictured below; it's close in form to the Persian, but displays Mughal characteristics (in the form and scale of the guard and pommel and the type of embellishment found on them.)

Regretably, the term Indo-Persian began to be applied much more generally back in the 1950s, to any weapon which might be Persian or Indian, Afghan, Ottoman or even Caucasian, and so it remains to the present. I mention this because I think most forum members will agree that specificity and clarity in terminology are central to the scientific discourse.

[estcrh]

Originally Posted by Oliver Pinchot

Regretably, the term Indo-Persian began to be applied much more generally back in the 1950s, to any weapon which might be Persian or Indian, Afghan, Ottoman or even Caucasian, and so it remains to the present. I mention this because I think most forum members will agree that specificity and clarity in terminology are central to the scientific discourse.

Oliver, from what I have observed it was the internet which caused "Indo-Persian" to cast such a wide net. Auctions, Ebay, dealers and buyers realized that search engines could scan and find specific terms. Using "Indo-Persian" as a catch all term made it easy to find and sell armor and weapons etc which would have previously been described in a dozen different terms.

Items from Germany, Italy, France etc could be lumped together under "European" but what about the items listed as "Oriental, Muslim, Eastern, Ottoman, Persian, Arab etc. "Indo-Persian" started to take the place of the many different terms. I use "IndoPersian" as an umbrella term as no other term currently in use brings items from so so diverse but closely related cultures together.

As often happens, terms change over the years and it seems that "Indo-Persian" has taken on an entirely new meaning. On a positive note, when you search online for "Indo-Persian weapons" or "Indo-Persian armor" you will find a vast amount of images and information that was not available even a few years ago without using many different search terms.

[Multumesc]

I was told that the sword is a sword africaine.Ma question is: In Africa were also produced and swords (tulwar)? I asked this question because they are very comfuz, after the owner told me said this is an African sword. Thank You.

[kronckew]

definitely NOT african.

the brits of course had colonial ties with india, pakistan, afghanistan and africa, and it's possible an official or military person collected it in india, carried it to africa and it remained there after he died or left for elsewhere, and was aquired by an african family who treasured it and passed it down until it's story was forgotten.