|
9th November 2016, 04:37 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 24
|
Mughal? or Indian dagger?.
Hello
I`m writing to ask you for an identification of the dagger. Probably it comes from the period of the Mughal Empire`rule but I`m not sure, it`s a specific item. The hilt is made from jadeit and the carved motifs on it are specific too. I have never seen something like that before. Or maybe it was made as another turistic souvenir?It`s difficult to say and the blade looks as it had been used before. It is incrusted with silver and contains some symbols perhaps Islamic . Please for more information. Best regards, Alex. |
14th November 2016, 10:40 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
Hello Alex,
Your suspicion is correct, it is a "touristic souvenir". It is not Mughal. The hilt is Asian (could be Chinese), the blade looks like cut from sheet metal, not forged. In my opinion this is more a fantasy item rather than anything particular or authentic. |
14th November 2016, 04:02 PM | #3 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
Quote:
But I'm just a collector, not an expert and for my eyes the pictures are not good enough for a proper statement. Some macro-pictures would be useful. Best wishes, Roland |
|
14th November 2016, 04:13 PM | #4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,220
|
I too thought that it was a tourist or export item when I saw this. I agree with Alex.
|
14th November 2016, 05:26 PM | #5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
Quote:
The hilt material does not look jade at all (i.e. nephrite jade), and the work actually does look machine made and very crude. There are tons of jade/jadeite/quartz daggers currently being produced in India. The blade could look old, but if it is cut of sheet metal - the look is irrelevant. The form is actually of Turkish kard (very vainly), but nothing is right about this one. Here's the proper SAMPLE |
|
14th November 2016, 11:04 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 24
|
Hello,
I see, there are different opinions. So, I will try to give you more details. First of all , the blade is not made from the sheet metal! it is double edged blade made from resilient and quenched steel and it gives beautiful sound. It was etched from deep corrosion which covered it in the whole. That`s why it has got dark a bit.But the incrustation before was completely invisible. The blade is not flat at all, as it seems to be on the photos, but it is slightly cylindrical and it narrows to the edges. The carving on the hilt is not done mechanically, for sure! The specialist from minerals and rocks said that it was hand-made. He also claims that it has to be an old work because of the detrition which can be seen with the naked eye. Unfortunately , the photos don`t show it. It is jadeite for sure (so called jade) the scratch is white and the hardness points that it isn`t a nephrite, it is rare and worth. The problem is from what culture and period it comes from. I couldn`t find information about. The motifs are very original and unusual. Tomorrow, I will give you more photos with high definition. I hope they will show much more to confirm what I`ve written above. It is difficult to take a good photo of it because it fades away, that`s why some attached photos have bigger contrast to show better the carving. Thank you for your interests, Alex. |
15th November 2016, 02:48 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 457
|
The blade is Ottoman from the beginning of the 20th century. The grip, whatever stone it is, is Persian work of the 1940s or 50s. It is what collectors call a "married" piece, i.e. two parts wedded together from disparate origins. These are often sold in bazaars and suqs in the Middle East and environs.
|
15th November 2016, 07:08 AM | #8 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
Quote:
Examine the grooves and engravings on the hilt under 10x magnification. If they have a circular cross-section, they are machined with a hand-held electric tool. If they have a crisp, triangular cross-section, they are carved/chiseled with a chisel. But in the end we all believe what we want to believe. |
|
17th November 2016, 11:29 PM | #9 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
Best regards. |
|
18th November 2016, 11:36 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
Thank you for the additional photos!
Certainly very poorly machine milled. No doubts about that. Also pretty sure it is Onyx, very abundant in central Turkey. Sorry! Last edited by mariusgmioc; 18th November 2016 at 02:56 PM. |
18th November 2016, 12:00 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
You may want o have a look at my posting regarding Jade/Onyx in the Ethnographic Miscellania section of this forum.
Last edited by mariusgmioc; 19th November 2016 at 10:45 AM. |
20th November 2016, 10:22 PM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 24
|
Hello,
I respect your opinion Marius ,the expert of minerals was thinking about the jade and bovenit. Finally he said that this is jade. The signs points to the use of simple tools, but there are some doubts. I see that nobody else wanted to comment that Everyone can be wrong only by looking at photos. I always rely on the opinions of the other people. Thank you. Best Regards, Alex |
|
|