|
13th April 2011, 08:56 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,781
|
Old Bali keris
Hello,
just bought this fine old Bali keris. Only the the wewer is missing. Scarce dapur with original Bali stain. And I like the wrongko from gembal jati (I think that it is this wood). What do you think, keep the hilt or change it to a figural hilt? In the moment I am incline to keep it with this hilt. Detlef |
13th April 2011, 11:02 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 928
|
IMO the hilt is OK
Nice keris |
13th April 2011, 11:07 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,225
|
Hi Detlef,
Nice keris. I would keep the hilt. Looks like a good original combi to me. Check the peksi , maybe the hilt should fit even lower and a uwer is not missing at all. A lot of old Bali Keris are without uwer. Other option is to sent it to the Netherlands Best regards, Willem |
14th April 2011, 01:26 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 56
|
Hello Detlef, it's nice keris !
The Pelet of hilt isn't match with the warangka, you probably need other hilt to this |
14th April 2011, 02:56 PM | #5 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,124
|
hmmm....if this hilt isn't a "match" for this sarong i don't know how you would go about finding one that matched better... I think this hilt looks fine. Have you removed it yet. It is possible that there might just be something up top of the hole that prevents the hilt from coming down more. If not it's easy enough to bore the hole a little deeper for a better fit. As for a uwer, a nice one is easily obtainable. Some very ornate hilts sometimes do not seem to need them. IMO this ensemble would look better with one. I am not convinced that all the Bali keris that we find without uwers were always that way. I think sometimes they may have been sold off along the way (if precious metals and jeweled) or damaged and not replaced. Certainly we see more elaborate hilts where a uwer would just be too much, but with a standard everyday dress like this it seems more appropriate.
Also IMO, the practice of collectors to so freely trade up for need hilts and other parts is a strange one to me. Unless something is damaged or out of place it is my general tendency to preserve the ensembles as they are. After all the keris comes to us with a certain amount of history and this hilt is part of that history. |
14th April 2011, 06:37 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,781
|
Thank you all for comment! Like I write before I am incline to keep the hilt. A nice uwer I still have, this don't will be a problem. I don't have the keris in my hands until now, I will post some pictures when I have received it. David, I am also not a friend to change a hilt when I see that this one was long together with a keris but many times you can't be sure about this. BTW I think that it was and still is a well-established practice to change hilts by a keris.
Willem, when I am bored with this keris I will send it to you! Regards, Detlef |
14th April 2011, 10:26 PM | #7 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,225
|
Quote:
And a lot of them where without uwer. But then again. This does not proof much. Considering that those keris are all pre WW2, one can imagine that for instance during WW2 museum personel would trade off the metal and gems for food / cigarettes and other daily needs. Anyway, lets see what Detlef can say once he receives the keris. Best regrards, Willem |
|
|
|