![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 449
|
![]()
Hello all! I am finally a member of this community although I have been watching for a while while trying to acquire information, I hope you will forgive me if I don’t immediately grasp everything especially the forum microculture which is different in every place and of course the terminology which I may not yet possess.
I am from the Netherlands where I’ve been living for the last 32 years. Of course as you know there are many krisses here, for obvious reasons. At the moment I am the proud owner of 5 keris , probably a mix of relatively new and maybe something assembled with older parts. This Keris which I like to show to the community was acquired from the estate of a former collector who passed away 35 years ago, the daughter told me that her father had bought most of his collection at a Dutch shop some 50 to 60 years ago. I bought 2 keris from her, This one and another from Madura , or at least with elements from Madura which I will show in another thread. The Hilt or Ukiran shows , I believe, Buta Nawa Sari, The Warangka en Pendok have other images carved in the wood. I would like to ask those with a better knowledge of the Balinese culture what they think about the depictions there. Are these scenes from the Ramayana ( as some people in the Netherlands have suggested). The wilah seems to be in relatively good state showing some slight pitting in parts . The Pamor is visible although at some point I may decide to have this going through a bath with some warangan to enhance the contrast even more and get rid of some oxidation which I think is there. The Pamor patter should be Pulo Tirto, Islands in holy waters (or so I’ve been told). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 280
|
![]()
Welcome, milandro!
I don't want to detract from your questions and observations, but will add that there appears to be a curve to this wilah that I haven't observed before in a Bali keris, but would more typically see in a Bugis-influenced keris. Provided that I'm not completely wrong, I wonder if it is a Lombok blade. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 459
|
![]()
Lombok keris? Nice keris.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
From the pics I would rather identify the pamor pattern as Wengkon Isen (frame with contents), and agree with the proposed Lombok origin rather than Bali.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 449
|
![]()
Thank you all, it may very well be from Lombok, which is my reason to ask for knowledge , thanks also for the revised suggestion on the pamor. I will try to learn about this. It was previously identified as such but of course I know that pamor identification is often debatable and debated.
I will post in another occasion pictures of another wilah that I think has a similar pamor and which is being etched at the moment and provided witha new Sarong. Also I will be curious to know about what you think about the pamorless tombak and the Merak engraved Madura Keris. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Welcome to the forum, Milandro!
The polish and stain seems to be original (or rather genuine Bali/Lombok style regardless of the origin of the blade) - keep it well oiled in a plastic sleeve and try to preserve it! I agree with Jean on the main pamor attempted here being wengkon; quite uncommon for any Bugis blades. Thus, I'd guess at local manufacture (probably Lombok) with possibly a good dose of Bugis influence. (And maybe a bit of east Java?) Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
P.S.: The blade could well be antique; the fittings are modern replacements though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
bali, buta nawa sari, polychrome, pulo tirto |
|
|