|
22nd April 2008, 03:17 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,596
|
Trabzon Sword
Hi Guys,
Finally, after some fiscal negotiations with the seller, I went ahead and bought myself this wee sword. I'm particularly pleased that it appears to have its original baldric type sling attached to the scabbard. As far as the dating goes I'm afraid I'm not too hot but I think it equates to 1908/09, I hope someone will set me right. I've not seen this type of leatherwork on the mouth of a scabbard before seems designed to exclude the elements, a nice touch I think. Blade 16 inches, total 21 1/2 inches. As usual all comments and thoughts much appreciated. Regards, Norman. |
22nd April 2008, 05:26 PM | #2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
Hi Norman
That is a real nice example. Congrats Lew |
22nd April 2008, 07:22 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,653
|
Agreed, very nice......there appears to be patterning in the steel....is this caused by the forging or the finish applied.
Regards David |
22nd April 2008, 08:53 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,182
|
that is a really nice knife.
i'm drooling already. |
22nd April 2008, 09:48 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 473
|
Hi Norman,
Very nice piece! the date on the blade is 1328 by the Maliyya calandar. That is roughly 1912 Gregorian. All the best Jeff |
22nd April 2008, 10:58 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,596
|
Lew, Many thanks.
David, I'm pretty sure it's down to the finish. Wayne, If you drool on me do I not rust!!!!! Jeff, Thanks for the dating info. Regards to all, Norman. Last edited by Norman McCormick; 22nd April 2008 at 11:10 PM. |
24th April 2008, 03:05 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,596
|
Ariel, I read with interest your link to a previous thread about these weapons. I noticed, on yours and others, that although the grips tend to be reasonably similar that there is quite a diversification in the blades not restricted to the fullers, which are mostly decorative and one would expect variations, but the blades seem to vary in shape considerably more than I would have expected for items with the same ethnographic background in time and place. From what I have been able to read these weapons don't occupy a great deal of time in history, late19th/early20th Century, is there a progression from start to finish in style e.g. simpler in the beginning and progressing to more complex shapes as time and taste advance or it may be that it is a regional variation . As it seems that a lot of these are dated it might not be too difficult to see if any links exists in the timeline of manufacture. Just a thought, nice pieces by the way.
Regards, Norman. |
24th April 2008, 03:16 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,596
|
David, I feel a bit silly I hadn't even thought about the leather being shaped to accomodate the shape of the throat when folded over, having said that if I tuck the leather into the scabbard throat it doesn't sit very well inside and I would have thought that someone that took the time to scallop the leather so neatly would have made a better job if the tags were to be glued inside the scabbard. I think I'm 50/50 on this, I can't see any evidence of glue either on the leather or the wooden surface inside the scabbard and the leather is quite secure right up to the lip of the scabbard mmmmm????? food for thought.
Regards, Norman. |
|
|