Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 29th December 2015, 09:11 PM   #1
Miguel
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 584
Default Indian Daggers?

Hi Everyone,

Whilst rooting in my collection I came across these three daggers which I think are 19th C.
Dagger No1:- I think that this is Indian with Arab influence, possibly from Bhuj. It is all steel construction with steel scabbard being decorated with koftgari work.
Overall length is 12.5 ins with a blade length of 8 ins x 1.375 ins wide.

Dagger No2:- I think that this is also Indian of all steel construction having a hilt of pistol or stylised birds head form with a chiselled foliage decoration. The blade is of flamboyant form with a decorated cartouche on each side.
The scabbard is of velvet covered wood, the nap having worn off the velvet.
Overall length is 18 ins with a blade length of 12.75 ins and width of 1.75 ins.

Dagger No3:- I am not sure whether this is Indian or Qajar period Persian. It is of all steel construction with a steel scabbard, the hilt and scabbard being decorated in a similar manner to Dagger No1.
Overall length is 15.5 ins with a blade length of 10.25 ins and width of 2 ins.

Your comments and confirmation or otherwise of origins and dating would be greatly appreciated.
Regards
Miguel
Attached Images
      
Miguel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2015, 09:16 PM   #2
Miguel
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 584
Default

Dagger No2:-
Attached Images
       
Miguel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2015, 09:19 PM   #3
Miguel
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 584
Default

Dagger No3:-
Attached Images
       
Miguel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2015, 09:55 PM   #4
ALEX
Member
 
ALEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
Default

Hello, Miguel
You're right, no.1 is Indian, rather modern, not much Arab influence, more of a novelty item to resemble Mughal style. The blade is of "tiger-eye" pattern, late 20 C.
No.2 is Persian Qajar, decent quality for this type, late 19/early 20C.
No. 3 is Persian/Indo-Persian), not as old as 2 but not as "recent" as 1)
ALEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2015, 10:03 PM   #5
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default

I have an uneasy feeling that all of them are either fully modern or assembled from new and somewhat older parts.
BTW, isn't the handle on #2 put backward? The pommel should be on the blade's convex side.
Am I wrong?
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2015, 10:08 PM   #6
ALEX
Member
 
ALEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
Default

Ariel, you're right. No 2 has handle other way, but it is Qajar nevertheless, could be for some reason or design it is that way, it looks matching as an item.
ALEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st December 2015, 08:11 PM   #7
Miguel
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALEX
Hello, Miguel
You're right, no.1 is Indian, rather modern, not much Arab influence, more of a novelty item to resemble Mughal style. The blade is of "tiger-eye" pattern, late 20 C.
No.2 is Persian Qajar, decent quality for this type, late 19/early 20C.
No. 3 is Persian/Indo-Persian), not as old as 2 but not as "recent" as 1)
Hi Alex,
Thank you very much for your comments, I never ceased to be impressed by yours and other members knowledge, I learn something every time. Would you say then that the first piece is meant for tourists or made to deceive? Thank you again and I wish you a Happy New Year.
Regards
Miguel
Miguel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2016, 08:28 PM   #8
ALEX
Member
 
ALEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miguel
Hi Alex,
...Would you say then that the first piece is meant for tourists or made to deceive? Thank you again and I wish you a Happy New Year.
Regards
Miguel
Hello Miguel,
Yes, this would be proper assessment. First was made for the decorative purposes. even though the blade is damascus, the technique is relatively simple, and it was not meant for use.
Happy New Year to you too!
ALEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.