|
27th November 2021, 04:53 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 31
|
Crossbows review please
Hi everyone,
I have pictutres of two crossbows here. I will appreciate information on their origin, age, maker if possible, whether used for hunting or military and most importantly their authenticity and value. Thank you and stay well. |
27th November 2021, 10:38 PM | #2 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,200
|
vantique,
Thanks for posting your interesting crossbow. Please note, we do not permit discussion of value. Ian |
28th November 2021, 11:00 AM | #3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Nice crossbows you show us, antique. Military ?
Perhaps if we move this thread to the European forum we will have more interested members to comment on them. And remember, we don't discuss prices here. |
28th November 2021, 11:31 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,204
|
After "Sir Ralph Payne-Gallway, The Crossbow", I think this is a sixteenth century sporting crossbow.
|
28th November 2021, 07:47 PM | #5 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Interesting that the claws section of the winder (cranequin) in the first crossbow are an 'articulated' piece. This is not seen in other crossbows out there.
Also its stock wood looks 'too impecable' ... but i don't know . As for maker, you should have a thorough search everywhere, looking for tiny marks, including on the cranequin; letters, shields, symbols. . |
28th November 2021, 08:50 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 261
|
I'm far from an expert on these, but from the ones I've glanced over in auction catalogues and looking at the replica's Todd Cuttler builds... These aren't giving me a warm feeling.
For starters, the craneguin looks fixed to the stock and too small compared to period ones. The proportions of the stock are peculiar and both of them look "unfinished" as opposed to aged. |
|
|