![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,852
|
![]()
Here you are people, a link to something that will enthrall and educate, as well as answer many questions that will no longer need to be asked:-
https://www.semanticscholar.org/pape...eee26265e7ac2a its all a bit over my head, and in any case, I much prefer the cogitative approach, but I'm sure it will be of interest to others. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,098
|
![]()
Egads man! What witchcraft is this! LOL!
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,852
|
![]()
Dunno David, above my pay grade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,165
|
![]()
Alan,
![]() Ian |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,852
|
![]()
Well Ian, since I understand very little about the technology used by this method, any opinion of mine on matters such as this must be regarded as inherently defective, but as I sort of flit around the edges of academia without being a part of academia, I have noted that very often people who know very little about one discipline, but a great deal about some other discipline sometimes produce hypotheses that illustrate their phenomenal depth on knowledge in respect of the known discipline whilst at the same time illustrating their abysmal ignorance in respect of the other.
Having this belief as a base upon which to respond to your question, I would venture that those who might use this wizardry to classify a keris would very likely be those who have virtually no understanding of the keris. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 910
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
As far as I could understand, this may be just a training exercise for machine image recognition. Kind of testing a simplified version of facial recognition. Machine reading of CT and MRI scans is under very active development. A very simple version is machine reading of ECGs, and is already widely used.
Kris, with their complexity of forms, are very handy model. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|