|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
7th September 2008, 12:07 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 119
|
weird, the types of things that get labeled as a yataghan.........
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=220258220967
from a while ago. it was an interesting peice but too many people bidding too much money on it for me....... |
|
|
|
7th September 2008, 12:37 AM
|
#2 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
looks like a composite piece to me
 Lew |
|
|
|
|
7th September 2008, 01:29 AM
|
#3 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,220
|
 EEK!
|
|
|
|
|
7th September 2008, 10:51 AM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Athens Greece
Posts: 479
|
We have talk about it, 1-2 months ago. In my opinion it is composite but it could be EARLY composite.
|
|
|
|
|
7th September 2008, 10:58 AM
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nothern Mexico
Posts: 458
|
Not a yataghan and maybe not turkish, thought from a turkish domain or area of influence, I believe, but certainly an interesting weapons which dreserves to be discussed, IMHO.
Regards Gonzalo |
|
|
|
|
7th September 2008, 01:28 PM
|
#6 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
I really don't think this is an early composite the serparate pieces maybe old but the job seems sloppy? Look at this pic of the rear of the cross guard notice the big slot cut out. I think if this was put together by a skilled old sword maker or local artisan he would have made his own cross guard.
Lew |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
