|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
13th May 2007, 06:49 PM | #1 | ||
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Magenta, Northern Italy
Posts: 123
|
Quote:
In effect Yokote originated in China, as you correctly state. The following sword is the one used by Shotoku Taishi and preserved in the Shosoin, Nara, dated to the Sui (if chinese) / Asuka (if japanese) period (VII c. A.D.) Origin still debated but in this period swords were imported in large quantities from China. The Yokote with even stronger changing in geometry then the one you've posted is evident, confirming the chinese origin of this feature, now usually considered a japanese one : Another example, same period but considered japanese, still identical to mainland swords : Quote:
if with wide meaning, is conventionally referred to curved swords. Jokoto and straight, ring pommelled Warabite-to had (have?) a blade geometry/section that wasn't good for cutting, being the Shinogi (ridge line), when present, too low (see examples hereabove). Of course you're right in saying they were used for slashing too, but not as primary purpose. The contrary of the later Katana, that had a rised Shinogi and a curvature that balanced the weakening of a thinner hardened cutting edge. Reversely, here we've a marginal only stabbing purpose, due to the cross section and general Sugata (shape), optimized for cutting. A good modern museum quality reproduction of a ring pommelled japanese Warabite-To, very similar to continental items (III/V c. A.D.) : Last edited by tsubame1; 13th May 2007 at 07:43 PM. |
||
14th May 2007, 05:23 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
Having stayed away from the vast world of Nihanto I am a bit confused by the discussion. I understand that many aspects of Japanese swords came from China, but the faceted tip is not found on Chinese swords as far as I know. I have seen the pictures posted of what may be a Chinese tribute blade (what do you call a present from one emperor to another?), but that is the only one I have ever seen. There are modern Chinese sword makers making "Han" style zheibeidao with tips like that, but I don't see them in actual Han examples. As HOS has some very good pictures of early iron and bronze pieces, can anyone site an example of a faceted tip? The zheibeidao form of the Tang dynasty that was copied by Japanese sword makers was preserved by Tibetan peoples and does not have a faceted tip.
Here is an example of a Chinese/Tibetan zhiebeidao. It is unusual in that the tip seems to have been separately applied, but there is no evidence of faceting. http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j6...duation285.jpg http://s77.photobucket.com/albums/j6...duation293.jpg http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j6...duation275.jpg Josh |
14th May 2007, 06:24 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
Hi Josh. Check out post #40 in this thread:
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showpo...9&postcount=40 Andrew |
14th May 2007, 06:27 PM | #4 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Magenta, Northern Italy
Posts: 123
|
Quote:
centuries ? Even in Japan such original items are no more then a few dozen, treasured in Shrines and a very few only documented. In actual paintings you can't find such a kissaki detail... There are no evidences this was a present from Chinese Emperor, too. Might be simply a very good blade purchased or custom ordered for the Emperor. Anyway, even if it was the case, I'm not sure that a "tribute blade" must necessarly have different features then the ones present on the battlefield items. On the contrary such features usually are much more detailed and well made to represent the status of both giving and receiving parts. Other then to quote the Tokyo National Museum I would add to my sources Nagayama Kokan in his "Token Kantei Dokuhon" in which he depicts another couple of them with chinese features and chinese provenance. Here the scan of a detail of page 13 of the english version (ISBN 4 7700 2071 6) Kiriha means "with ridge line", Kamasu Kissaki means exactly the point's shape of the pics I've posted, with Yokote. Last edited by tsubame1; 14th May 2007 at 06:57 PM. |
|
15th May 2007, 05:02 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
I am sorry for pushing this, but it is a fascinating question for me. The only Chinese blades with a facetted tip seem to be in Japan, and then there is the one from this thread that was restored to show the faceting. What did it look like before the restoration? I went back through the HOS pictures of bronze swords, which are in good enough condition and well photographed enough to show a faceted tip but could not find any. There are good Tibetan blades going back 500 years without any change in style, and then there are these 2000-year-old bronze blades that are still in roughly the same form. I know little of the intervening 1500 years. Thomas Chen's website describes the Tang and Sui swords in Japanese collections as probably from China, but they also could have been polished in a Japanese style.
One of the characteristics of Chinese swords is that many styles of many periods can be found coexisting, but they all seem to have lost the faceted tip if they ever had one. Such tips are not in my understanding found on typical swords of the Qing, Ming, Yuan or Song dynasties. They are certainly not visible in art from those periods that I have examined, and they are not found on antique examples done in those styles. (i.e. not necessarily dated to a particular dynasty but in the style of the dynasty). I am not at all saying that such tips could not have existed. There are records of many Japanese blades ending up in China, and I have seen pictures of some possible examples that do not show faceted tips. So clearly Japanese blades would have had them, but maybe they lost their faceting? Would all of the Chinese blades also have lost their faceting? I would really like to see what the jian tip shown as an example in this thread looked like before restoration. Maybe I simply don't see faceting where others can. I have seen angled points like those shown, just not the distinct separate tip as found on Japanese swords. If such tips are there, it wouldn't be the first time I have had to learn to see something. Josh |
15th May 2007, 06:06 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
I don't think it's unreasonable to pursue this area of inquiry at all, Josh. I have no expertise in this area, so I'm limited to a role as a spectator, however.
What I can do is split this off so we have a separate, dedicated thread, which the issue certainly deserves. |
15th May 2007, 08:06 PM | #7 | |||
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Magenta, Northern Italy
Posts: 123
|
Whew, I belived this topic was deleted and me banned again ...
Quote:
near to mint conditions. The "seven stars" one has very light carving on them showing, among other things, a constellation. Japanese polishing consists in using abrasive stones that would have deleted the carvings even in a much lighter polishing then the one needed to change the point geometry (you have to maintain the plans geometries and proportions so EVERYTHING on the blade must be polished in a deep restoration.) Not to say that the japaneses had no reasons in changing that shape. It has to be noted, too, that the japaneses (that are quiet proud of their nationality) never denied this provenance even during the mad '30s in wich nationalism and xenophobia reached the top. Quote:
weaponry to have not other examples to show (in effect I've another one with mounting but is still treasured in Japan so counts as the other ones..) Quote:
there are two explanations for this : improper polishing that deleted the Yokote or simply a slightly different blade geometry called "Shobu Zukuri". A faceted tip is harder to make. Most of the blades sold to China were the so-called kazuuchimono, mass produced blades still very effective but not of the same quality of the good ones. Such inferior blades were widely made for large armies in japan too during certain periods in which enormous armies had to be supplied, and a shobuzukuri (without faceted tip) cutting blade was easier to make, hence, I believe, the absence of it on some of the chinese examples. Of course, Shobuzukuri blades were made even in high quality standards, but you hardly provide potential enemy with the best of your production. I would like to be advised by if you find something that can support or even deny this theory as it is of great importance to me. A sources showing chinese blade with this type of point would be a *great* contribution to my studies. I'll make the same, no matter what comes out, with you. |
|||
15th May 2007, 08:12 PM | #8 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
Quote:
Conscience bothering you, perhaps? |
|
|
|