|
21st January 2005, 03:59 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oahu, Hawaii
Posts: 166
|
Maranao Datu? Kris
Mabuhay Y'all! I find my self once again in the Philippines after a long absence this time with an agenda in mind. To acquire some pieces that I should have got the last time I was here.
Let me pause right here and mention that I FINALLY got the opportunity to meet with Ian. Thrilled and awed are the first two words that come to mind followed closely by appreciate and gratitude. He was kind enough to spend the majority of a day walking me around to all his known "contacts" and more than that he generously shared his in-depth knowledge of Philippine culture and weapons. I will be eternally grateful. Might I add that he's "A DAMN fine looking young man" With his introductions (and the Philippines is nothing if not a nation based on personal relationships) I was able to pick up this kris which I daily am forced to pull from its tagub and slice the air with. Nothing tells you more about a blade than cleaning it. While if Cato's book holds true, this is a Maranao kris blade (elephant mouth shape and position)and probably a fighting version of a datu kris (straight blade and hilt shape), I feel the blade is quite a bit older than the dress. I didn't think that originally. The metal was quite tarnished and required hours to clean, the wood has a deep patina that is quite gorgeous in person and the ivory pommel had some kind of lacquer like bulid up that I was not entirely able to remove (and truthfully did not want to entirely erase). The blade itself was black, with active rust around the asang-asang. After cleaning however I noted two things, the dress although extremely tarnished shows none of the bangs and dings of use and the blade has been reset using what looks like Blue gasket seal. However contrary to that the silver chasing has been worn almost off on the underside of the hilt which you would expect of an older piece and some of the copper wire bands have loosened with age so I am of two minds. None the less the artistry of form and the symetry of design continue to draw my eye every time I enter the room. WHOOO! Thanks again Ian this piece is definately second only to my Bangkok era darb. Enough said, enjoy the pictures a first shot of the blade before cleaning and the rest speak for themselves. AND after conservation As a neophyte in Moro arms all comments are welcome. |
21st January 2005, 04:02 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oahu, Hawaii
Posts: 166
|
Sword Shopping
And as I promised Ian you're gonna be famous!
The old stud himself (could hardly keep the ladies off him) |
21st January 2005, 04:27 PM | #3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,293
|
Too Late Now !
Welcome to the Kris fraternity Dan !
Now get back to collecting those Daab Dha Darb thingies . If you can ... muahahahaha . Seriously though , it looks like a pretty old Maranao blade that may have been re-hilted some 50 years ago . The dress is quite nice , very nice engraving but the baca baca would be too light for a Maranao battle sword IMHO . |
21st January 2005, 05:29 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
Great catch! I am most fascinated by the greneng -- the 'Y' shaped incisions which I thought was rather unusual.
|
21st January 2005, 11:14 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
the artwork on the hilt is so....beautiful! i hope you left me some good ones. great kris, wilked! do you have some other ones that you might want to share with us?
|
22nd January 2005, 12:18 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 940
|
I agree with Rick. This keris has been re-hilted with a rather nice looking piece at that and the sheath is also fairly new. My guess is that this was not a datu blade at all, but something more common place. It is obviously a pre-1930s style and likely 19thC, but IMO the workmanship is not up to datu class blades. It is not unusal for old blades like this to be spiced up with fancy dress to make them more appealing for sale. Still a nice looking kris that i would be happy to own.
|
22nd January 2005, 12:47 AM | #7 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,226
|
Welcome to the insane and confusing world of PI/Moro collecting. Nice piece. Yes it is a later dress than the blade. I agree more recent. Did you check to see if the fittings are silver or aluminum? The patination indicates silver to me, but a jeweler could test and tell you with certainty.
Ian is a wonderful man, informative, and very patient (I bow in your presence ). |
22nd January 2005, 04:32 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
[QUOTE=Rick]Welcome to the Kris fraternity Dan !
Now get back to collecting those Daab Dha Darb thingies . If you can ... muahahahaha . [QUOTE] I agree, Dan. Wanna sell some dha? |
22nd January 2005, 05:39 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 312
|
As others have noted the dressing is modern. It has become common practice in many Manila antique shops to dress-up older blades in modern fittings, and then try to "antique" the fittings. In some even trickier shops, they are now re-using old salvaged woods and other materials to give it an older look and color. Particularly in Maranao country, such as Tugaya, one can see a plethora of re-fitted old blades mixed in with newly made ones. I would be interested in what the shop owner had to say about the kris, whether or not he mentioned it as being a re-fit.
|
22nd January 2005, 05:49 AM | #10 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,226
|
Federico, what you have said may explain what I have been seeing on eBay for the past 2 years: old blades with new fittings with varying degrees of craftsmenship, but not in the old styles.
|
24th January 2005, 07:44 PM | #11 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 738
|
Quote:
THANKS |
|
25th January 2005, 03:31 PM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oahu, Hawaii
Posts: 166
|
Manila
Carlos, It's in Manila about three blocks from the US embassy. Smack in the middle of a nightlife district.
|
27th January 2005, 11:03 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 738
|
THANKS FOR THE INFORMATION, I´M THINKING TO CHANGE MY PLACE OF HOLIDAYS!!
|
22nd January 2005, 09:01 AM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: VISAYAS and MINDANAO
Posts: 169
|
Refitting an old Moro blade is not uncommon since the blade is the heart of any sword. If the blade is really well made, it should outlast several dress changes. The dress on Dan's kris is well executed and not grossly overdone. I've seen some of those overdone krises (usually made for the tourist market) that are too gaudy to be considered serious weapons. I tend to agree with Rick that the redress of this sword was probably done around 50 years ago. More recent work tends to be gaudier and lower craftsmanship. It's still a nicely done sword. Good catch, Dan!
Now...are you going to tell us about that barong you're holding in the picture? |
22nd January 2005, 09:25 AM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 312
|
While traditional in use re-fitting is not un-heard of, I am suspicious of this piece being done older (50 years ago). Particularly due to the heavy attempt to age the fittings, blue glue (I just dont think blue glue would stay blue for fifty years, I would see it getting darker from ), and the blackened blade with live rust (generally the blades that get this treatment are in rough shape to highlight the age) and that Ive have seen this plainer fitting motif on newer pieces that I have been told were new. I also have my doubts about this blade being a good candidate for the owner to put such fittings. If it were traditional fittings, he is upgrading a battle blade with datu-esque fittings. Particularly after WWII, I am suspicious. If he is jumping up in rank, during the fifties I can think of other vestiges that would be more common.
I hate to say it, but while over-done pieces are easier to detect, those who try to pass of old as new are getting smarter and are realizing subtler construction is easier to pass off. There have been a number of pieces that Ive seen, and known were modern composites and was surprised at the sophistication they are starting to attain. |
22nd January 2005, 02:16 PM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
Again, the focus in discussing re-hilting seems to focus on the concept of deception. Why? The focus in actual re-hilting is usually to provide one where there is none (or a very damaged one). In so doing the craft-man may take into account that a once ordinary item is now a valuable antique, and so its social status has been lifted, and a fancier dress than it would originally have worn may so seem appropriate. He will often use a style contemporary/familiar to himself. He will often try to give it an overall look and surface that matches the piece, rather than "leaping out" as a repair/replacement, so that it looks good, not so much to deceive(and when he doesn't imitate the old style, how serious can his suposed intent to decieve be?). Those who hire one to do repairs on thier noncommercial properties typically request this, BTW. I don't mean to be ethnically insensitive, but it's an education to watch the modern/American mind at work; everything is assumed to be about show and deception. In my opinion this often says more about that culture than about those it tries (usually unsuccessfully, IMHO) to anylize.
I have read that, in addition to smelling bad, social injustice, and cannibalism, differing cultures almost always find each other to be decievers; it seems peoples have different views on what constitutes honesty, and partly because of this (and partly because it's true, of course) tend to consider each other horribly dishonest. This concept has been penetrating my mind, as I try to deal with and comprehend those who suround me in this world. Last edited by tom hyle; 22nd January 2005 at 02:44 PM. |
22nd January 2005, 04:28 PM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oahu, Hawaii
Posts: 166
|
Redress
I am sure the redress was done quite some time ago and here's why. I've polished many a sword and this one took three applications to bring out the brilliance. While I agree that the actual setting of the blade may have been earlier than fifty years ago the dress shows definative age and undoubtably usage wear at exactly the points it should, index finger placement (the chasing is almost worn off there) and at heel of the hand. Many bands are seperated and lower ones remain tighly woven. The grime, especially that imbedded in the copper wire wrap, was especially difficult to remove and was not just dirt but oily grime that had set in over time. The ivory was particularrly hard to clean and is still embedded in the three cracks that show (I only showed the best side).
Zelbone, will post the Barung(s) tomorrow. Andrew, yes I do have some dha for sale - you can bid on them at my funeral after you pry them from my cold dead hands!!!! Your address was where in Florida and you're taking your vacation when? I have not turned, I've simply EXPANDED I have limited my collection by two criteria either I've worked there or worked with their troops. Hell if I didn't I'd definately go broke especially with all those flambouyant Indian swords I love to look at. Best to you all and thanks for the input. |
22nd January 2005, 09:53 PM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 312
|
Of course, I would not be surprised if the dress was 10 or 20 years old, when I implied newer than 50 years old, I did not mean it was made yesterday, or even the year before.. But I am suspicious when it comes to Manila Antique shops. While I would like to tell myself, oh it is a traditional upgrade of hilts. Ive seen and been told too many stories from "Manila Antique" shops telling me that they have a "Maranao Datu's piece" that "displays all the fine acruitriments of a wealthy persons sword such as ivory or silver or gold", etc... and above all it is all original. In this case the upgrade of hilts was not to repair a good ol piece that was missing a hilt, but an intentional upgrade to turn a common persons kris that would sell for a lower price, into a "Datu's" kris at a much higher price. Which is why I am interested in what the seller had to say. If he is open about it being a composite, then I am more inclined to believe I am being overly paranoid, but if instead he gives a lovely story about an original piece then I become much more skeptical about the "traditional" repair. Also, pusaka pieces are not lightly given in Moroland today. If indeed it was a traditional re-do, and the owner hit hard times, the owner would do his best to keep the blade. Moro royalty, the only ones for whom such a re-build would be proper (the jump in stature for a commoner, even a rich commoner would be a very bad slip in social etiquite) are very much aware of how their ancestors were robbed of fine pieces on the field of battle, and many if not all are very protective of what few cultural heirlooms they have left. Which leads to then, why get rid of such a fine piece, after taking so much time and money to get it re-done so well, when there would at least be a few options around it? Now of course we can get into the role of the MNLF fighting in the 70s, a time when many fighters did sell pieces in dire straights, but stuff sold in this period, since the MNLF was largely a common persons movement, and not overly filled with royalty (many of whom were entrenched in official government) were plainer less guady swords. Now, current groups have other means of raising capital, and straights arent so dire. Which leads us back to why sell the pusaka?
|
|
|