![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Followed this item, stated as 19th C but certainly looks 20thC. The blade does look to have quality, with lamination showing...certainly does not look acid etched. If I am correct I think it went relatively cheaply, and wouldn't have minded it in my collection.
I wondered what others thought. http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...6439&rd=1&rd=1 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Added some pics of the blade tried to enhance them alittle, best I can do with the small listing pictures....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
![]()
I would love to have an expert opinion on this one, but I am about 90% sure it is a fake. The fittings seem fanciful, and certainly do not match what I am used to. Also I do not see signs of heat treatment on the blade, which should be visible with this degree of polish.
I am quite suspicious. Josh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,842
|
![]()
Well I am 100% sure it is repro/fake. Why waste money on this sort of thing when you can get something real for the same price or less. How many times has this advice been said here.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]()
It Screams repro to me!
Lew |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
![]()
Thanks, I was 100% sure, and even went so far as to warn the first bidder, but then as I looked more I became a bit less certain. There are so many aspects of Chinese swords that I do not know.
I am glad to have had my initial suspicion confirmed, and I am glad I gave a warning to at least one bidder. Josh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|