|
|
|
4th April 2006, 10:35 PM
|
#1 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
Another Tombak For Comment
Comments and evaluations would be much appreciated .
|
|
|
|
5th April 2006, 03:34 AM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 372
|
What a spectular piece Rick. I cant add anything to what you know I am sure, but can you tell us a little more about the dimensions and regarding the metuk, is that a composite or inlay.
|
|
|
|
|
5th April 2006, 06:27 AM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
A very beautiful tombak Rick. Recent, dress and blade, but a very nice piece.
|
|
|
|
|
5th April 2006, 01:50 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 940
|
Sweet Rick!
Beautiful execution all around. Did this come from Mr. M?
|
|
|
|
|
5th April 2006, 05:51 PM
|
#5 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
Any ideas on origin of manufacture ?
|
|
|
|
|
6th April 2006, 02:58 AM
|
#6 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
Dimensions Etc.
This blade is 16 1/4 inches from tip of pesi to tip of blade.
At the base from ron dha to ron dha it is 1 1/2 inches. The blade at it thickest point, immediately above the metuk is 16/20ths. of an inch. The metuk is 22/20ths. of an inch circumference. The gold work is kinatah, that is, the Javanese style of koftgari. |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
