![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Hi,
I am hoping that someone may be able to provide information about a mark on the blade of a Mandinka Sword that I have. I purchased the sword at an auction many years ago and am just curious about the mark. I have searched on the internet without any luck. Much appreciated ksdw |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
Not a single reaction?
This is not my field, but it is a great looking sword. My guess is a rehilted reworked british sabre. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,708
|
![]()
No reaction doesn't mean some of us aren't trying to find an answer.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,843
|
![]()
According to " Pictorial History of Swords & Bayonets, R.J.Wilkinson.Latham" the crown is "British inspectors mark" and from "Swords of the British Army, Brian Robson, National Army museum Publications" the blade appears to be a version of a troopers "sword, light cavalry, pattern 1796" To cut a long story short, they were in service for about 30 years. Discarded swords were much sought after in India and I suspect traded widely elsewhere.
These swords were made by private manufacturers, supply delays due to wretched quality led to the decision that in future the Board of Ordnance would maintain a reserve of properly tested swords at the tower of London to meet any sudden expansion. So tracking down the mark which I think is "Warren" might prove quick a task. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,708
|
![]() Quote:
I agree the crown appears to correspond to a British inspection mark, however typically this is followed by a letter and/or a number. The lion is quite odd in this regard and the bit I'm having trouble tracking down. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,843
|
![]()
Who knows how strict or how slack or the proper stamping procedure now?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|