![]() |
|
|
#16 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,698
|
I'm inclined to agree, the configuration of the 'ears' and overall appearance of the blade seems indeed yataghan, and Ottoman presence in Arabian regions was of course well established. The use of the yataghan form there is somewhat anomalous.
|
|
|
|
|
|