Quote:
|
Originally Posted by migueldiaz
That's a possibility, though at the moment such claim is classified as pseudoscience I believe 
Mythbusters if it can regarded as a good experimenter (perhaps it is), is supposed to have busted the belief (though some claim that the same experiment proved otherwise).
Personally, I don't believe that plants or trees are sentient (anatomically, they don't have a brain or a nervous system, etc.). And I'm sure Fearn can elaborate on this more.
But after knowing that those Indians do perceive something from plants and they have evidence to prove such allegation, I'm now having second thoughts  |
I meant that comment as a half-joke, and half alluding to the fact that these people
may be better at discovering the beneficial properties of some plant species than we are. But, some people just have a good sense of the world around them. Some people can just read people. Some just understand dogs, don't know why but they do. Perhaps some people can just tell something about plants. This "tree-listening" is a whole new concept to me, never looked at things that way.... even if technically trees don't speak.. it's the concept I mean, not the actually "communication"