Hi Glen,
Great example, of no doubt masonic symbols on a late 18th century saber. But, I am not sure it answers my question of; were officers allowed to put obvious Masonic symbols on their regulation field or dress weapons? Clearly symbols appear on Masonic ceremonial pieces, the Ames catalogues show obvious symbols on military presentation pieces, and Hamilton cites examples of symbols added to retired military pieces, but I can't think of a mixing of clearly masonic symbols and the usually military motifs. Was it against regulations? What I am getting at is; A large number of officers in the late 18th century, early 19th century were masons, who clearly found some importance in symbols, it would stand to reason that if they were not allowed to openly display there signs, they would go to more covert methods.
I really don't know, but, still think it is possible that the original bead hilts do have some masonic significance. However it is very far from being proved. I also believe that the significance was lost as the original hilts became the style which further muddys the water.
All the Best
Jeff
|