Ethnographic Arms & Armour - View Single Post

ALEX · 9th January 2009, 04:21 PM

My first guess was for wootz. Not the best quality pattern, but I think it is wootz... if judging by appearance. The chemanalysis would propably not confirm it:-)
Sham is by definition low contrast, and the contrast is high here, hence I'd not vote for sham.

9th January 2009, 04:21 PM	#2
ALEX Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 936	My first guess was for wootz. Not the best quality pattern, but I think it is wootz... if judging by appearance. The chemanalysis would propably not confirm it:-) Sham is by definition low contrast, and the contrast is high here, hence I'd not vote for sham. Last edited by ALEX; 9th January 2009 at 06:36 PM.