Quote:
|
Originally Posted by clockwork
Dave first off if you read the bill you would see that the bill contradicts it self and all the sudden there are gun on this bill that were outlawed on the old one. So do I think I miss read it not really since it was written with a bunch of attorney that double speak in every way. The Second amendment was given to the American people so that we could never be oppressed by the government and is not open to vast interpretation as you state. if you truly understand are history it is special interest groups and attorneys that have warped over the last 50 years. So I have to say that I completely disagree with you on your interpatation of are rights in this country.
|
Clockwork, i will not argue with you that the bill might have some contradictions, however, your understanding of it originally clearly was mistaken. I also will not argue that lawyers use double-speak and are often hard to understand, so i do see why you might have been confused. As for the second amendment, it has been a point of argument for years so obviously it is open to vast interpretation as to exactly what our founding fathers had in mind. You say that you disagree with me on my interpretations of rights in "this country". Aren't you in Germany. What country are you talking about? MY country or YOUR country. Is American constitutional law a hobby of yours? I personally don't assume to fully know nor interpret the rights of Germans.