I've thought long and hard about this, but I've finally decided to do it anyway.
I do not agree with the posting of photographs of keris which I identify as a part of my collection. As a general rule I will only post a photograph of something from my personal collection when I decide that I want to sell it.
The keris shown in this post is one from my personal collection, and I have no intention of offering it for sale. I have adjusted the photograph so that all you should be able to see is a silhouette of the keris.
This keris was given the tangguh of Pengging by two of the most experienced ahli keris I know, one of whom was also a very well known empu.
It also displays all the features of a Pengging keris as I have shown in my earlier post.
I am not claiming that it is Pengging, but the weight of opinion available to me seems to indicate that most experienced people would regard this keris as tangguh Pengging.
Compare this form with the form already claimed as representing Pengging. They are very dissimilar.
I do not claim that this keris is representative of Pengging, and the tombak already shown is not representative of Pengging.
What I do claim is that there can be significant disagreement as to exactly what Pengging tosan aji looks like.
This is the reason why it is always desireable to qualify opinions on tangguh.
|